Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24624367›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2014

Prevalence of shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes at public access watershed sites in a California Central Coast agricultural region.

Michael B Cooley, Beatriz Quiñones, David Oryang, Robert E Mandrell, Lisa Gorski

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Quantitative Risk Assessment Model forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Prevalence of Shiga-ToxigenicMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence of STEC virulence markers andFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative analyses of persistence traits inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pathogenicity assessment of Shiga toxin-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Saprophytic Lifestyle ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael B CooleyProduce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture Albany, CA, USA.
Beatriz QuiñonesProduce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture Albany, CA, USA.
David OryangDivision of Risk Analysis, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration College Park, MD, USA.
Robert E MandrellProduce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture Albany, CA, USA.
Lisa GorskiProduce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture Albany, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Produce contaminated with enteric pathogens is a major source of foodborne illness in the United States. Lakes, streams, rivers, and ponds were sampled with Moore swabs bi-monthly for over 2 years at 30 locations in the vicinity of a leafy green growing region on the Central California Coast and screened for Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC), Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes to evaluate the prevalence and persistence of pathogen subtypes. The prevalence of STEC from 1386 samples was 11%; 110 samples (8%) contained E. coli O157:H7 with the highest prevalence occurring close to cattle operations. Non-O157 STEC isolates represented major clinical O-types and 57% contained both shiga toxin types 1 and 2 and intimin. Multiple Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis of STEC isolates indicated prevalent strains during the period of study. Notably, Salmonella was present at high levels throughout the sampling region with 65% prevalence in 1405 samples resulting in 996 isolates with slightly lower prevalence in late autumn. There were 2, 8, and 14 sites that were Salmonella-positive over 90, 80, and 70% of the time, respectively. The serotypes identified most often were 6,8:d:-, Typhimurium, and Give. Interestingly, analysis by Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis indicated persistence and transport of pulsotypes in the region over several years. In this original study of L. monocytogenes in the region prevalence was 43% of 1405 samples resulting in 635 individual isolates. Over 85% of the isolates belonged to serotype 4b with serotypes 1/2a, 1/2b, 3a, 4d with 4e representing the rest, and there were 12 and 2 sites that were positive over 50 and 80% of the time, respectively. Although surface water is not directly used for irrigation in this region, transport to the produce can occur by other means. This environmental survey assesses initial contamination levels toward an understanding of transport leading to produce recalls or outbreaks.

Indexed as

AgricultureAnimalsCaliforniaFresh WaterHumansListeria monocytogenesMolecular TypingPrevalenceSalmonella entericaSerotypingShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliagricultureleafy-vegetable productionListeria monocytogenesprevalenceSalmonellaSTEC non-O157STEC O157:57watersheds

Identifiers

PMID24624367
PMCPMC3940966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.