Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24623511›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurophysiology2014

Adaptation of naturally paced saccades.

Michael J Gray, Annabelle Blangero, James P Herman, Josh Wallman, Mark R Harwood

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A generative learning model for saccade adaptation.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael J GrayPhD Program in Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience, The Graduate Center at City University of New York, New York, New York; Department of Biology, The City College of New York, New York, New York; and michaelgr87@gmail.com.
Annabelle BlangeroDepartment of Biology, The City College of New York, New York, New York; and.
James P HermanDepartment of Biology, The City College of New York, New York, New York; and Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Josh WallmanDepartment of Biology, The City College of New York, New York, New York; and.
Mark R HarwoodDepartment of Biology, The City College of New York, New York, New York; and.

Funding

TNC FUNCTION IN APOPTOTIC ANTIGEN DRIVEN AUTOIMMUNITYG12RR003060 · NCRR · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI WALLMAN, JOSHUA · 1985 to 2011
$26.1M
Cellular/Molecular Basis of Development: Research CenterG12MD007603 · NIMHD · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI PEZZANO, MARK · 2012 to 2017
$11.5M
Is saccade adaptation guided by reinforcement?R01EY019508 · NEI · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI EDELMAN, JAY A · 2009 to 2013
$1.3M
NCRR NIH HHS 2G12 RR-03060-26A1NEI NIH HHS 1R01 EY-019508NIMHD NIH HHS 8G12 MD-007603-27
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the natural environment, humans make saccades almost continuously. In many eye movement experiments, however, observers are required to fixate for unnaturally long periods of time. The resulting long and monotonous experimental sessions can become especially problematic when collecting data in a clinical setting, where time can be scarce and subjects easily fatigued. With this in mind, we tested whether the well-studied motor learning process of saccade adaptation could be induced with a dramatically shortened intertrial interval. Observers made saccades to targets that stepped left or right either ∼250 ms or ∼1,600 ms after the saccade landed. In experiment I, we tested baseline saccade parameters to four different target amplitudes (5°, 10°, 15°, and 20°) in the two timing settings. In experiments II and III, we adapted 10° saccades via 2° intrasaccadic steps either backwards or forwards, respectively. Seven subjects performed eight separate adaptation sessions (2 intertrial timings × 2 adaptation direction × 2 session trial lengths). Adaptation proceeded remarkably similarly in both timing conditions across the multiple sessions. In the faster-paced sessions, robust adaptation was achieved in under 2 min, demonstrating the efficacy of our approach to streamlining saccade adaptation experiments. Although saccade amplitudes were similar between conditions, the faster-paced condition unexpectedly resulted in significantly higher peak velocities in all subjects. This surprising finding demonstrates that the stereotyped "main sequence" relationship between saccade amplitude and peak velocity is not as fixed as originally thought.

Indexed as

Task Performance and AnalysisAdaptation, PhysiologicalFemaleHumansMaleMotion PerceptionMotor SkillsNeuronal PlasticityPhotic StimulationSaccadesYoung Adultmain sequencemotor learningsaccade adaptationspeed-accuracy trade-off

Identifiers

PMID24623511
PMCPMC4097875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.