ArticleJAMA surgery2014
Socioeconomic disparities in mortality after cancer surgery: failure to rescue.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Disparities in Access to Oncologic Care in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Disparities in Surgical Access: A Systematic Literature Review, Conceptual Model, and Evidence Map.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2019Pooled it
- The association between the Distressed Communities Index and failure to rescue after cardiac surgery among Medicare beneficiaries.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic Impact, Equity, and Sustainability in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: A Structured Narrative Review.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Socioeconomic disadvantage and the risk for adverse post-operative outcomes after gynecologic cancer surgery.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2025Article
- Social deprivation and morbidity and mortality after surgery: a UK national observational cohort study.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Observational
- Inequities in 'failure to rescue' for Indigenous Māori after gastrointestinal cancer surgery in New Zealand.The British journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Exploring rural-urban differences in the receipt of nonelective cancer-specific gastrointestinal surgery using a multilevel mixed-effects approach.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025Article
- Social Determinants of Health Impact Complications Following Free-Flap Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Hospital Quality and Racial Differences in Outcomes After Genitourinary Cancer Surgery.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Reply to: "Preoperative COVID-19 and Postoperative Mortality in Cancer Surgery: Correspondence", by Daungsupawong and Wiwanitkit.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Surgical subspecialist distribution and Social Vulnerability Indices in the inland empire.Surgery open science · 2024Article
- Article
- Socioeconomic distress is associated with failure to rescue in cardiac surgery.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Article
- Smoking increases risk of complication after musculoskeletal surgery: analysis of single immune parameter to predict complication risk.EXCLI journal · 2024Article
- Comparison of failure to rescue in younger versus elderly patients following lung cancer resection.JTCVS open · 2023Article
- Failure to Rescue in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Regional Australian Experience.World journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Surgical Treatment at an Academic Medical Center is Associated with Statistically Insignificant Lung Cancer Survival Outcome Differences Related to ZIP Code.World journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Understanding Potentially Preventable Mortality Following Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Surgery: Analysis of a National Audit of Surgical Mortality.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceDisparities in operative mortality due to socioeconomic status (SES) have been consistently demonstrated, but the mechanisms underlying this disparity are not well understood.
objectiveTo determine whether variations in failure to rescue (FTR) contribute to socioeconomic disparities in mortality after major cancer surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review File and the Medicare Denominator File. A summary measure of SES was created for each zip code using 2000 US Census data linked to residence. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the influence of SES on rates of FTR, and fixed-effects hierarchical regression was used to evaluate the extent to which disparities could be attributed to differences among hospitals. A total of 596,222 patients undergoing esophagectomy, pancreatectomy, partial or total gastrectomy, colectomy, lung resection, and cystectomy for cancer from 2003 through 2007 were studied. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Operative mortality, postoperative complications, and FTR (case fatality after ≥1 major complication).
resultsPatients in the lowest quintile of SES had mildly increased rates of complications (25.6% in the lowest quintile vs 23.8% in the highest quintile, P = .003), a larger increase in mortality (10.2% vs 7.7%, P = .0009), and the greatest increase in rates of FTR (26.7% vs 23.2%, P = .007). Analysis of hospitals revealed a higher FTR rate for all patients (regardless of SES) at centers treating the largest proportion of patients with low SES. The adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) of FTR according to SES ranged from 1.04 (0.95-1.14) for gastrectomy to 1.45 (1.21-1.73) for pancreatectomy. Additional adjustment for hospital effect nearly eliminated the disparity observed in FTR across levels of SES. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients in the lowest quintile of SES have significantly increased rates of FTR. This finding appears to be in part a function of the hospital where patients with low SES are treated. Future efforts to improve socioeconomic disparities should concentrate on hospital processes and characteristics that contribute to successful rescue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.