Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24622951›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2014

Randomised Evaluation of modified Valsalva Effectiveness in Re-entrant Tachycardias (REVERT) study.

Andrew Appelboam, Adam Reuben, Clifford Mann, Trudie Lobban, Paul Ewings, Jonathan Benger, Jane Vickery, Andrew Barton, James Gagg

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew AppelboamDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Adam Reuben
Clifford Mann
Trudie Lobban
Paul Ewings
Jonathan Benger
Jane Vickery
Andrew Barton
James Gagg
Musgrove Park Hospital · GBRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GBThe Arrhythmia Institute · USUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0211-24145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) is a recommended first-line physical treatment for patients with re-entrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), but is often ineffective in standard practice. A failed VM is typically followed by treatment with intravenous adenosine, which patients often find unpleasant. VM effectiveness might be improved by a modification to posture which exaggerates the manoeuvre's vagal response and reduces the need for further emergency treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial in 10 UK emergency departments (EDs). It compares a standard VM with a modified VM incorporating leg elevation and a supine posture after a standardised strain in stable adult patients presenting to the ED with SVT. The primary outcome measure is return to sinus rhythm on a 12-lead ECG. Secondary outcome measures include the need for treatment with adenosine or other antiarrhythmic treatments and the time patients spend in the ED. We plan to recruit approximately 372 patients, with 80% power to demonstrate an absolute improvement in cardioversion rate of 12%. An improvement of this magnitude through the use of a modified VM would be of significant benefit to patients and healthcare providers, and justify a change to standard practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the South West-Exeter Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 12/SW/0281). The trial will be published in an international peer reviewed journal. Study findings will be sent to the European and International resuscitation councils to inform future revisions of arrhythmia management guidelines.

resultsThe trial will also be disseminated at international conferences and to patients through the Arrhythmia Alliance, a patient support charity. REGISTRATION: The study is registered with Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN67937027) and has been adopted by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network.

Indexed as

PostureValsalva ManeuverAdenosineAdolescentAdultAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsElectrocardiographyHumansTachycardia, SupraventricularYoung AdultAdenosineAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAccident & Emergency Medicine

Identifiers

PMID24622951
PMCPMC3963093
OpenAlexW2119454006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.