Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24622763›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014

Laparoscopic liver resection in the semiprone position for tumors in the anterosuperior and posterior segments, using a novel dual-handling technique and bipolar irrigation system.

Tetsuo Ikeda, Takao Toshima, Norifumi Harimoto, Youichi Yamashita, Toru Ikegami, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Yuji Soejima, Ken Shirabe, Yoshihiko Maehara

Registry-linked trialAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04277065 (Short Outcomes Between Bulldog vs. Cotton Tourniquet in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04277065 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Short Outcomes Between Bulldog vs. Cotton Tourniquet in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorhui houRan2020 to 2022Enrolled88ConditionsLaparoscopic Liver Resection, Vascular Occlusion, TourniquetArmsBULLDOG ,A Useful Vascular Occlusion Tourniquet In Laparoscopic Liver Resection, cotton tourniquet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Surgical Glove Technique for Laparoscopic Liver Resection.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Technical aspects of laparoscopic liver surgery : Transfer from open to laparoscopic liver surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Laparoscopic liver resection: the current status and the future.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tetsuo IkedaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan, t-ikeda@surg2.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Takao Toshima
Norifumi Harimoto
Youichi Yamashita
Toru Ikegami
Tomoharu Yoshizumi
Yuji Soejima
Ken Shirabe
Yoshihiko Maehara

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatic tumors in the lower edge and lateral segments are commonly treated by laparoscopic liver resection. Tumors in the anterosuperior and posterior segments are often large and locally invasive, and resection is associated with a higher risk of insufficient surgical margins, massive intraoperative bleeding, and breaching of the tumor. Laparoscopic surgery for such tumors often involves major hepatectomy, including resection of a large volume of normal liver tissue. We developed a novel method of laparoscopic resection of tumors in these segments with the patient in the semiprone position, using a dual-handling technique with an intercostal transthoracic port. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and usefulness of our technique.

methodsOf 160 patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection at our center from June 2008 to May 2013, we retrospectively reviewed those with tumors in the anterosuperior and posterior segments. Patients were placed supine or semilateral during surgery until January 2010 and semiprone from February 2010.

resultsBefore the introduction of the semiprone position in February 2010, a total of 7 of 40 patients (17.5%) with tumors in the anterosuperior and posterior segments underwent laparoscopic liver resection, and after introduction of the semiprone position, 69 of 120 patients (57.5%) with tumors in the anterosuperior and posterior segments underwent laparoscopic liver resection (P < 0.001). There were no conversions to open surgery, reoperations, or deaths. The semiprone group had a significantly higher proportion of patients who underwent partial resection or segmentectomy of S7 or S8, lower intraoperative blood loss, and shorter hospital stay than the supine group (all P < 0.05). Postoperative complication rates were similar between groups.

conclusionsLaparoscopic liver resection in the semiprone position is safe and increases the number of patients who can be treated by laparoscopic surgery without increasing the frequency of major hepatectomy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Loss, SurgicalCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHepatectomyHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePatient PositioningPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID24622763
PMCPMC4077249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.