Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24622759›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2014

Amniotic fluid embolism: an interdisciplinary challenge: epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Werner H Rath, Stefan Hoferr, Inga Sinicina

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Werner H RathFaculty of Medicine, Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Institute of Forensic Medicine, LMU Munich.
Stefan Hoferr
Inga Sinicina
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a life-threatening obstetric complication that arises in 2 to 8 of every 100 000 deliveries. With a mortality of 11% to 44%, it is among the leading direct causes of maternal death. This entity is an interdisciplinary challenge because of its presentation with sudden cardiac arrest without any immediately obvious cause, the lack of specific diagnostic tests, the difficulty of establishing the diagnosis and excluding competing diagnoses, and the complex treatment required, including cardio - pulmonary resuscitation.

methodWe selectively reviewed pertinent literature published from 2000 to May 2013 that was retrieved by a PubMed search.

resultsThe identified risk factors for AFE are maternal age 35 and above (odds ratio [OR] 1.86), Cesarean section (OR 12.4), placenta previa (OR 10.5), and multiple pregnancy (OR 8.5). AFE is diagnosed on clinical grounds after the exclusion of other causes of acute cardiovascular decompensation during delivery, such as pulmonary thromboembolism or myocardial infarction. Its main clinical features are severe hypotension, arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, pulmonary and neurological manifestations, and profuse bleeding because of disseminated intravascular coagulation and/or hyperfibrinolysis. Its treatment requires immediate, optimal interdisciplinary cooperation. Low-level evidence favors treating women suffering from AFE by securing the airway, adequate oxygenation, circulatory support, and correction of hemostatic disturbances. The sudden, unexplained death of a pregnant woman necessitates a forensic autopsy. The histological or immunohistochemical demonstration of formed amniotic fluid components in the pulmonary bloodflow establishes the diagnosis of AFE.

conclusionAFE has become more common in recent years, for unclear reasons. Rapid diagnosis and immediate interdisciplinary treatment are essential for a good outcome. Establishing evidence-based recommendations for intervention is an important goal for the near future.

Indexed as

ComorbidityDiagnosis, DifferentialEmbolism, Amniotic FluidFemaleHumansIncidenceMaternal DeathPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularRisk FactorsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID24622759
PMCPMC3959223
OpenAlexW1540438347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.