ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2014
Realizing the potential of synthetic biology.
Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An Analysis of the Governance, Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Biocomputing.Science and engineering ethics · 2026Article
- Diagnosing soil bioremediation failure: evidence-weighted pathways from mechanism to field closure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Thermodynamically consistent, reduced models of gene regulatory networks.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Orthogonal RNA replication enables directed evolution and Darwinian adaptation in mammalian cells.Nature chemical biology · 2025Article
- Fine-Tuning Genetic Circuits via Host Context and RBS Modulation.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- An alternative view on the ethics of synthetic biology: an Indian Hindu perspective.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2025Article
- Dynamic energy conversion in protein catalysis: From brownian motion to enzymatic function.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Cellular Site-Specific Incorporation of Noncanonical Amino Acids in Synthetic Biology.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Article
- Optimizing the conversion of phosphoenolpyruvate to lactate by enzymatic channeling with mixed nanoparticle display.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- Sustainable production of natural products using synthetic biology: Ginsenosides.Journal of ginseng research · 2024Review
- Designed allosteric protein logic.Cell discovery · 2024Article
- A Genetic Circuit Design for Targeted Viral RNA Degradation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Israel and the global synthetic biology ecosystem.Engineering biology · 2023Review
- Regulation strategies for two-output biomolecular networks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Modelling genetic stability in engineered cell populations.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The Systems and Synthetic Biology of Auxin.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022Review
- Cell-Free PURE System: Evolution and Achievements.Biodesign research · 2022Review
- Synthetic biology landscape and community in Germany.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic biology, despite still being in its infancy, is increasingly providing valuable information for applications in the clinic, the biotechnology industry and in basic molecular research. Both its unique potential and the challenges it presents have brought together the expertise of an eclectic group of scientists, from cell biologists to engineers. In this Viewpoint article, five experts discuss their views on the future of synthetic biology, on its main achievements in basic and applied science, and on the bioethical issues that are associated with the design of new biological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.