Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24622604›Full record

SynthesisDeutsches Arzteblatt international2014

Self-management of oral anticoagulation.

Andrea Siebenhofer, Klaus Jeitler, Karl Horvath, Wolfgang Habacher, Louise Schmidt, Thomas Semlitsch

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03878160 (Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Delivered Via Group Videoconferencing for Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With Elevated Depression Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03878160 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Delivered Via Group Videoconferencing for Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With Elevated Depression Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2018 to 2020Enrolled27ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, Depression, Myocardial Infarction, Unstable AnginaArmsIndividual Interview
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea SiebenhoferInstitute of General Practice, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, EBM Review Center, Medical University of Graz, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Graz, Institute of Biomedicine and Health Sciences (HEALTH), JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbh, Graz.
Klaus Jeitler
Karl Horvath
Wolfgang Habacher
Louise Schmidt
Thomas Semlitsch
Joanneum Research · ATMedical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProperly dosed oral anticoagulation effectively prevents thromboembolic events. It is unclear whether adult patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation can benefit from self-management in terms of patient-oriented endpoints and improved coagulation values.

methodWe selectively searched the Medline database for high-quality systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials of self-measurement or self-management of oral anticoagulation, compared to standard treatment.

resultsWe identified eight review articles based on overlapping sets of ran - domized clinical trials. In all of these systematic reviews, patients who performed self-measurement or self-management had a 40% to 50% lower rate of thromboembolic events; in six of them, the mortality was also significantly lower, by 30% to 50%. Subgroup analysis revealed that these effects were present exclusively in patients who performed self-management, and not in those who only performed self-measurement. None of the review articles revealed any difference in the frequency of severe hemorrhagic events. Quality of life and patient satisfaction were rated in five reviews, which, however, used different instruments, with the result that no clear conclusions could be drawn. All of the review articles documented an improvement in coagulation values, but information on statistical significance was mostly lacking.

conclusionAdults with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation benefit from self-management, as compared to standard treatment with management of dosing by a physician. A limitation of this study is that the multiple review articles on which it is based were largely analyses of the same group of clinical trials.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsBlood Coagulation TestsHumansPrevalenceSelf AdministrationThromboembolismTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID24622604
PMCPMC3953995
OpenAlexW2144317579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.