ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014
Identification and differentiation of Candida parapsilosis complex species by use of exon-primed intron-crossing PCR.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Emerging PathogenInfection and drug resistance · 2024Review
- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay with Lateral Flow Strips for Rapid Detection of Candidiasis Due to Candida parapsilosis.Current microbiology · 2023Article
- A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Article
- Molecular Diagnosis of Yeast Infections.Current fungal infection reports · 2021Review
- Multicenter Evaluation of a PCR-Based Digital Microfluidics and Electrochemical Detection System for the Rapid Identification of 15 Fungal Pathogens Directly from Positive Blood Cultures.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
- Capability of Fluorescent Capillary Electrophoresis To Distinguish Species of theJournal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- Comparison of four molecular approaches to identify Candida parapsilosis complex species.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2017Article
- Hyphal wall protein 1 gene: A potential marker for the identification of differentCurrent medical mycology · 2016Article
- Molecular Identification of Candida Species Isolated from Onychomycosis in Shanghai, China.Mycopathologia · 2015Article
- Molecular Characterization of Candida africana in Genital Specimens in Shanghai, China.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Article
- Development of two molecular approaches for differentiation of clinically relevant yeast species closely related to Candida guilliermondii and Candida famata.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Candida parapsilosis complex is composed of Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto, Candida orthopsilosis, Candida metapsilosis, and the closely related species Lodderomyces elongisporus. An exon-primed intron-crossing PCR assay was developed here to distinguish the members of the species complex on the basis of the distinct sizes of amplicons, and Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis were further discriminated by restriction enzyme analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.