Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24621513›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Diet quality limits summer growth of field vole populations.

Kristian M Forbes, Peter Stuart, Tapio Mappes, Katrine S Hoset, Heikki Henttonen, Otso Huitu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reviewing the effects of food provisioning on wildlife immunity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristian M ForbesSuonenjoki Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Suonenjoki, Finland; Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Peter StuartSuonenjoki Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Suonenjoki, Finland; Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tapio MappesDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Katrine S HosetSection of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Heikki HenttonenVantaa Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa, Finland.
Otso HuituSuonenjoki Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Suonenjoki, Finland.
University of Jyväskylä · FIMasaryk University · CZUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marked variation occurs in both seasonal and multiannual population density peaks of northern European small mammal species, including voles. The availability of dietary proteins is a key factor limiting the population growth of herbivore species. The objective of this study is to investigate the degree to which protein availability influences the growth of increasing vole populations. We hypothesise that the summer growth of folivorous vole populations is positively associated with dietary protein availability. A field experiment was conducted over a summer reproductive period in 18 vegetated enclosures. Populations of field voles (Microtus agrestis) were randomised amongst three treatment groups: 1) food supplementation with ad libitum high protein (30% dry weight) pellets, 2) food supplementation with ad libitum low protein (1% dry weight; both supplemented foods had equivalent energy content) pellets, and 3) control (no food supplementation), n = 6 per treatment. Vole density, survival, demographic attributes and condition indicators were monitored with live-trapping and blood sampling. Highest final vole densities were attained in populations that received high protein supplementation and lowest in low protein populations. Control populations displayed intermediate densities. The survival rate of voles was similar in all treatment groups. The proportion of females, and of those that were pregnant or lactating, was highest in the high protein supplemented populations. This suggests that variation in reproductive, rather than survival rates of voles, accounted for density differences between the treatment groups. We found no clear association between population demography and individual physiological condition. Our results demonstrate that dietary protein availability limits vole population growth during the summer growing season. This suggests that the nutritional quality of forage may be an underestimated source of interannual variation in the density and growth rates of widely fluctuating populations of herbivorous small mammals.

Indexed as

DietSeasonsAnimalsArvicolinaeDietary ProteinsDietary SupplementsFemaleMalePopulation DensityPregnancyDietary Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24621513
PMCPMC3951337
OpenAlexW1994649998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.