Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24621503›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2014

CAPER, a novel regulator of human breast cancer progression.

Isabelle Mercier, Donna M Gonzales, Kevin Quann, Timothy G Pestell, Alexander Molchansky, Federica Sotgia, James Hulit, Ricardo Gandara, Chenguang Wang, Richard G Pestell and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Role of RNA-Binding Proteins in Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. U2AFEMBO reports · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. UHM-ULM interactions in the RBM39-U2AF65 splicing-factor complex.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Isabelle MercierDepartment of Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine; Kimmel Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Philadelphia College of Pharmacy; University of the Sciences in Philadelphia; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Donna M GonzalesDepartment of Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine; Kimmel Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kevin QuannDepartment of Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine; Kimmel Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Timothy G PestellDepartment of Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine; Kimmel Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexander MolchanskyDepartment of Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine; Kimmel Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Federica SotgiaDepartment of Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine; Kimmel Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia, PA, USA; Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit; Institute of Cancer Sciences; University of Manchester; Manchester, UK.
James HulitBreakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit; Institute of Cancer Sciences; University of Manchester; Manchester, UK.
Ricardo GandaraBreakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit; Institute of Cancer Sciences; University of Manchester; Manchester, UK.
Chenguang WangDepartment of Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine; Kimmel Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Richard G PestellDepartment of Cancer Biology; Kimmel Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael P LisantiDepartment of Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine; Kimmel Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia, PA, USA; Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit; Institute of Cancer Sciences; University of Manchester; Manchester, UK.
Jean-François JasminDepartment of Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine; Kimmel Cancer Center; Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Philadelphia College of Pharmacy; University of the Sciences in Philadelphia; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of the Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CAPER is an estrogen receptor (ER) co-activator that was recently shown to be involved in human breast cancer pathogenesis. Indeed, we reported increased expression of CAPER in human breast cancer specimens. We demonstrated that CAPER was undetectable or expressed at relatively low levels in normal breast tissue and assumed a cytoplasmic distribution. In contrast, CAPER was expressed at higher levels in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) specimens, where it assumed a predominantly nuclear distribution. However, the functional role of CAPER in human breast cancer initiation and progression remained unknown. Here, we used a lentiviral-mediated gene silencing approach to reduce the expression of CAPER in the ER-positive human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. The proliferation and tumorigenicity of MCF-7 cells stably expressing control or human CAPER shRNAs was then determined via both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Knockdown of CAPER expression significantly reduced the proliferation of MCF-7 cells in vitro. Importantly, nude mice injected with MCF-7 cells harboring CAPER shRNAs developed smaller tumors than mice injected with MCF-7 cells harboring control shRNAs. Mechanistically, tumors derived from mice injected with MCF-7 cells harboring CAPER shRNAs displayed reduced expression of the cell cycle regulators PCNA, MCM7, and cyclin D1, and the protein synthesis marker 4EBP1. In conclusion, knockdown of CAPER expression markedly reduced human breast cancer cell proliferation in both in vitro and in vivo settings. Mechanistically, knockdown of CAPER abrogated the activity of proliferative and protein synthesis pathways.

Indexed as

AnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Cycle CheckpointsCell ProliferationDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansMCF-7 CellsMice, NudeNeoplasm TransplantationNuclear ProteinsPhosphorylationProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenProtein BiosynthesisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-junHCC1 autoantigenNuclear ProteinsProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenProto-Oncogene Proteins c-junRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Small Interferingbreast cancerCAPERestrogen receptorproliferationtumor growth

Identifiers

PMID24621503
PMCPMC4049962
OpenAlexW1995715522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.