Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24620771›Full record

ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2014

A framework for biobank sustainability.

Peter H Watson, Sara Y Nussbeck, Candace Carter, Sheila O'Donoghue, Stefanie Cheah, Lise A M Matzke, Rebecca O Barnes, John Bartlett, Jane Carpenter, William E Grizzle and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The case for an integrated biobanking initiative in South Asia.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Establishing a Pregnancy Lyme Disease Biobank.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sustainable biobanks: a case study for a green global bioethics.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Peter H Watson1 University of British Columbia Office of Biobank Education and Research , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada .
Sara Y Nussbeck
Candace Carter
Sheila O'Donoghue
Stefanie Cheah
Lise A M Matzke
Rebecca O Barnes
John Bartlett
Jane Carpenter
William E Grizzle
Randal N Johnston
Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
Leigh Murphy
Katherine Sexton
Lois Shepherd
Daniel Simeon-Dubach
Nikolajs Zeps
Brent Schacter

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
UAB / UMN SPORE in Pancreatic CancerP50CA101955 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BUCHSBAUM, DONALD J · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each year funding agencies and academic institutions spend millions of dollars and euros on biobanking. All funding providers assume that after initial investments biobanks should be able to operate sustainably. However the topic of sustainability is challenging for the discipline of biobanking for several major reasons: the diversity in the biobanking landscape, the different purposes of biobanks, the fact that biobanks are dissimilar to other research infrastructures and the absence of universally understood or applicable value metrics for funders and other stakeholders. In this article our aim is to delineate a framework to allow more effective discussion and action around approaches for improving biobank sustainability. The term sustainability is often used to mean fiscally self-sustaining, but this restricted definition is not sufficient for biobanking. Instead we propose that biobank sustainability should be considered within a framework of three dimensions - financial, operational, and social. In each dimension, areas of focus or elements are identified that may allow different types of biobanks to distinguish and evaluate the relevance, likelihood, and impact of each element, as well as the risks to the biobank of failure to address them. Examples of practical solutions, tools and strategies to address biobank sustainability are also discussed.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksHumans

Identifiers

PMID24620771
PMCPMC4150367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.