Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24619636›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2014

The feasibility and reliability of transient elastography using Fibroscan®: a practice audit of 2335 examinations.

Jack X Q Pang, Faruq Pradhan, Scott Zimmer, Sophia Niu, Pam Crotty, Jenna Tracey, Christopher Schneider, Steven J Heitman, Gilaad G Kaplan, Mark G Swain and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing Interactions betweenInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jack X Q Pang
Faruq Pradhan
Scott Zimmer
Sophia Niu
Pam Crotty
Jenna Tracey
Christopher Schneider
Steven J Heitman
Gilaad G Kaplan
Mark G Swain
Robert P Myers

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 84371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography is widely used in the management of patients with chronic liver disease.

objectivesTo examine the feasibility and reliability of LSM, and to identify patient and operator characteristics predictive of poorly reliable results.

methodsThe present retrospective study investigated the frequency and determinants of poorly reliable LSM (interquartile range [IQR]⁄median LSM [IQR⁄M] >30% with median liver stiffness ≥7.1 kPa) using the FibroScan (Echosens, France) over a three-year period. Two experienced operators performed all LSMs. Multiple logistic regression analyses examined potential predictors of poorly reliable LSMs including age, sex, liver disease, the operator, operator experience (<500 versus ≥500 scans), FibroScan probe (M versus XL), comorbidities and liver stiffness. In a subset of patients, medical records were reviewed to identify obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg⁄m2).

resultsBetween July 2008 and June 2011, 2335 patients with liver disease underwent LSM (86% using the M probe). LSM failure (no valid measurements) occurred in 1.6% (n=37) and was more common using the XL than the M probe (3.4% versus 1.3%; P=0.01). Excluding LSM failures, poorly reliable LSMs were observed in 4.9% (n=113) of patients. Independent predictors of poorly reliable LSM included older age (OR 1.03 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.05]), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.58 [95% CI 1.05 to 2.37), coagulopathy (OR 2.22 [95% CI 1.31 to 3.76) and higher liver stiffness (OR per kPa 1.03 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.05]), including presumed cirrhosis (stiffness ≥12.5 kPa; OR 5.24 [95% CI 3.49 to 7.89]). Sex, diabetes, the underlying liver disease and FibroScan probe were not significant. Although reliability varied according to operator (P<0.0005), operator experience was not significant. In a subanalysis including 434 patients with body mass index data, obesity influenced the rate of poorly reliable results (OR 2.93 [95% CI 0.95 to 9.05]; P=0.06).

conclusionsFibroScan failure and poorly reliable LSM are uncommon. The most important determinants of poorly reliable results are older age, obesity, higher liver stiffness and the operator, the latter emphasizing the need for adequate training.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultComorbidityElasticity Imaging TechniquesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisLogistic ModelsMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedObesityReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID24619636
PMCPMC4071883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.