Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24619576›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2014

Hemodynamic effects of topical lidocaine on the laryngoscope blade and trachea during endotracheal intubation: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.

Sue-Young Lee, Jeong Jin Min, Hyun Joo Kim, Deok Man Hong, Hyun-Jung Kim, Hee-Pyoung Park

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02918526 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Hemodynamic Study With Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) of the Cardiovascular Response to the Positioning of the Extraglottic Device in Gynecological Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria CareggiRan2016 to 2017Enrolled94ConditionsIntubation Complication, Hemodynamic InstabilityArmsairway management
NCT06226532 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Lidocaine Sprayed at the Laryngeal Inlet and Endotracheal Tube Cuff Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response During Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Neurosurgical Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorKhon Kaen UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsLaryngoscopy, Intubation, Hemodynamics, NeurosurgeryArmslidocaine spray, Intravenous Lidocaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sue-Young LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea.
Jeong Jin Min
Hyun Joo Kim
Deok Man Hong
Hyun-Jung Kim
Hee-Pyoung Park

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinimizing hemodynamic changes during the peri-intubation period is a concern for anesthesiologists. We investigated the effect of lidocaine sprayed on the laryngoscope blade and trachea on hemodynamics during direct laryngoscopic intubation.

methodsSeventy-two patients were randomly allocated to one of four groups: 10% lidocaine was sprayed either on the laryngoscope blade (group L), on the trachea (group V), or on the laryngoscope blade and the trachea (group LV). No lidocaine was used in group C. Anesthesia was induced in all patients with remifentanil (effect site concentration: 4.0 ng/ml) and propofol (effect site concentration 4.0 μg/ml) continuous infusion using a target control infusion (TCI) device. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded during the peri-intubation period.

resultsChanges in MAP and HR over time were markedly different among the four groups (P < 0.05). MAP at 1 min post-intubation was significantly lower in groups L, V, and LV than in group C (86.1 ± 12.7, 85.3 ± 12.6, and 83.7 ± 13.1 vs. 106.3 ± 22.9 mmHg, P < 0.01). Maximum MAP values were lower in groups L and LV than in group C (P < 0.05). HRs at 1, 2, and 3 min post-intubation were lower in group LV than in group C (70.4 ± 9.0 vs. 84.2 ± 15.3; 64.0 ± 8.1 vs. 79.2 ± 15.4; 61.6 ± 8.3 vs. 77.2 ± 14.5 beats/min, P < 0.01, respectively).

conclusionsLidocaine sprayed on the laryngoscope blade and/or trachea reduced the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopic intubation during the post-intubation period following anesthetic induction with remifentanil and propofol using a TCI device.

Indexed as

LaryngoscopesAdultAnesthesiaArterial PressureDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopyLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesPropofolLidocainePiperidinesPropofolRemifentanil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.