Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24619559›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2014

Clinical considerations of regenerative medicine in osteoporosis.

Hiromu Ito

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A study of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features and influence factors of pelvic bone marrow in adult females.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hiromu ItoThe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan, hiromu@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis-related fractures may severely limit activities of daily living and may require bed rest, which may become life threatening in elderly people. Osteoporosis has attracted much attention recently because of its severe effects on the daily activities of older people and because it is now treatable, thanks to recent advances in drug discovery. However, these medications have yet to reduce fully the number of fracture cases. On the other hand, declines in the number and function of osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the bone marrow and within the periosteum lead to reduced osteogenesis and bone formation. Thus, bone regeneration, through induction of MSCs, provides a rational therapeutic strategy for preventing or treating age-related osteoporosis. In this review, I summarize cell-related issues in osteoporosis, stem cell candidates for cell-based therapy, and possible therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationOsteoblastsOsteogenesisCell DifferentiationHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesRegenerative MedicineTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.