ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2014
HDL hypothesis: where do we stand now?
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Atherosclerosis, and Cardiovascular Disease in Asia.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Systemic consequences of abnormal cholesterol handling: Interdependent pathways of inflammation and dyslipidemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Liver X receptors and liver physiology.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2021Review
- Metabolism of PLTP, CETP, and LCAT on multiple HDL sizes using the Orbitrap Fusion Lumos.JCI insight · 2021Article
- High-Density Lipoprotein Modifications: A Pathological Consequence or Cause of Disease Progression?Biomedicines · 2020Review
- Effect of niacin monotherapy on high density lipoprotein composition and function.Lipids in health and disease · 2020Article
- Lipid Profiles in Out-of-Hospital Sudden Unexpected Death.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2018Article
- Potential of lipoproteins as biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2017Review
- Pre-heparin lipoprotein lipase mass as a potential mediator in the association between adiponectin and HDL-cholesterol in type 2 diabetes.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2017Article
- miRNAs and High-Density Lipoprotein metabolism.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2016Review
- Micro-RNAs and High-Density Lipoprotein Metabolism.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2016Review
- Prolonged sleep restriction induces changes in pathways involved in cholesterol metabolism and inflammatory responses.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Observational
- Low High-Density Lipoprotein and Risk of Myocardial Infarction.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2015Review
- HDL/ApoA-1 infusion and ApoA-1 gene therapy in atherosclerosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2015Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is robust epidemiological evidence dating back to the original Framingham Heart Study from 1977 that indicates an important inverse relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and risk of incident coronary artery disease (CAD). Despite this body of scientific information demonstrating that low levels of HDL-C are an independent predictor of subsequent CAD events, multiple therapeutic attempts to raise HDL-C levels have failed to demonstrate a consistent reduction in prognostically important endpoints such as death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. Recently, several major randomized trials using different therapeutic interventions have raised appropriate concerns about our basic understanding of HDL-C and whether the "HDL hypothesis" of lowering cardiovascular events through therapeutic interventions directed at raising HDL-C is a scientifically viable one. While two recent randomized controlled trials (AIM-HIGH and HPS2-THRIVE) failed to show a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients treated to optimally low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at baseline with extended-release niacin on a background of simvastatin, these clinical trials studied specific populations of stable ischemic heart disease patients. The data from these two contemporary trials cannot be extrapolated to all patient populations, such as those with acute coronary syndromes or myocardial infarction or those with significant residual mixed dyslipidemia not treated with optimal doses of intensive statin therapy, as these patients were excluded by trial design in both studies. Therefore, at the present time, there is insufficient evidence from clinical trials to recommend HDL-targeted therapy for additional event reduction in CAD patients. However, we will review the relevant data from recent major trials (AIM-HIGH, HPS2-THRIVE, ILLUMINATE, and dal-OUTCOMES) and highlight the potential clinical implications of these trials in modern pharmacotherapy as it relates to HDL-C raising and potential cardiovascular event reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24619460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.