Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24619434›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Analysis of a summary network of co-infection in humans reveals that parasites interact most via shared resources.

Emily C Griffiths, Amy B Pedersen, Andy Fenton, Owen L Petchey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Prophylactic effect of cutaneous leishmaniasis against COVID-19: a case-control field assessment.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Bovine tuberculosis disturbs parasite functional trait composition in African buffalo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily C GriffithsDepartment of Entomology, North Carolina State University, , Raleigh, NC 27695-7613, USA, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, , Alfred Denny Building, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK, Centre for Immunology, Infection and Evolution, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Ashworth Labs, University of Edinburgh, , Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, , Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK, Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zürich, , Winterthurerstrasse 190, Zürich 8057, Switzerland.
Amy B Pedersen
Andy Fenton
Owen L Petchey

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simultaneous infection by multiple parasite species (viruses, bacteria, helminths, protozoa or fungi) is commonplace. Most reports show co-infected humans to have worse health than those with single infections. However, we have little understanding of how co-infecting parasites interact within human hosts. We used data from over 300 published studies to construct a network that offers the first broad indications of how groups of co-infecting parasites tend to interact. The network had three levels comprising parasites, the resources they consume and the immune responses they elicit, connected by potential, observed and experimentally proved links. Pairs of parasite species had most potential to interact indirectly through shared resources, rather than through immune responses or other parasites. In addition, the network comprised 10 tightly knit groups, eight of which were associated with particular body parts, and seven of which were dominated by parasite-resource links. Reported co-infection in humans is therefore structured by physical location within the body, with bottom-up, resource-mediated processes most often influencing how, where and which co-infecting parasites interact. The many indirect interactions show how treating an infection could affect other infections in co-infected patients, but the compartmentalized structure of the network will limit how far these indirect effects are likely to spread.

Indexed as

CoinfectionHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsBacterial InfectionsHumansModels, BiologicalMycosesParasitesParasitic DiseasesVirus Diseasesdegree distributionecological networkindirect interactionsmodularityparasite ecologypolymicrobial infection

Identifiers

PMID24619434
PMCPMC3973251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.