ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2014
Role of PET in lymphoma.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02389101 (Molecular and Whole-body MR Imaging in Lymphomas), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Molecular and Whole-body MR Imaging in Lymphomas
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- CNN-based detection of pediatric lymphoma on whole body [American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Emerging Applications of EpCAM-Targeted Nuclear Medicine Probes: Current Research and Future Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Predictive value of Dmax and %ΔSUVmax ofBMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Comparison of FDG PET/CT and Bone Marrow Biopsy Results in Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma with Subgroup Analysis of PET Radiomics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Standardized classification schemes in reporting oncologic PET/CT.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Quality Initiative in Clinical Practice: A Single-Institution Appraisal of Quality Metrics in the Management of Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2019Article
- Detection and quantification of beta cells by PET imaging: why clinical implementation has never been closer.Diabetologia · 2018Article
- Comparison of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with gallium-67 scintigraphy in the initial clinical staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.International journal of hematology · 2018Article
- CT-based texture analysis potentially provides prognostic information complementary to interim fdg-pet for patients with hodgkin's and aggressive non-hodgkin's lymphomas.European radiology · 2017Article
- Article
- The role of FDG-PET in Hodgkin lymphoma.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2017Review
- FDG PET/CT response in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Reader variability and association with clinical outcome.Medicine · 2016Observational
- Diagnostic and prognostic role of PET/CT in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and progressive disease.Leukemia · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(18) F-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), combined with a multidetector helical CT (PET/CT) has emerged, in the past decade as one of the most important prognostic tool for lymphoma management. Besides proving as the only imaging technique able to recapitulate all the information yielded by the standard radiological staging and restaging, it provided new essential information for chemosensitivity assessment and radiotherapy planning. In lymphoma staging, functional imaging (FI) by PET/CT was shown to be more accurate than conventional radiological (anatomical) imaging to detect nodal and extranodal involvement, whereas in posttreatment restaging it showed a superior predictive value on treatment outcome. In Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), FI concurred to delineate a new paradigm of therapy in which PET is considered an essential tool to guide physician's choice on treatment intensity and modality. In fact, PET proved very useful for: 1) assessing chemosensitivity early during treatment to predict final therapy outcome; 2) managing a residual mass, detected by CT scan in up to two thirds of patients at the end of chemotherapy; and 3) planning radiotherapy in early-stage disease when conformal radiotherapy fields are used to spare toxicity to adjacent tissues. The early chemosensitivity assessment is the underpinnings of a new therapeutic strategy in HL, aimed at minimizing treatment-related toxicity while maintaining treatment efficacy. Several clinical trials are currently underway to test this hypothesis. In diffuse, large, B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), PET/CT proved very useful: 1) in lymphoma staging, leading to upward stage migration in one third of the patients; and 2) to identify patients benefiting from consolidation radiotherapy for FDG-avid, single mass or limited-extension disease. Different to HL, the role of interim PET in DLBCL remains controversial. In follicular lymphoma (FL) preliminary studies PET/CT proved useful, in baseline staging to predict time to treatment in patients in which a watchful observation without treatment (watch and wait) was chosen as therapeutic approach treatment. In FL end-of-treatment PET/CT proved the most powerful prognostic tool to predict long-term treatment outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.