Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24619406›Full record

ArticleDer Orthopade2014

[Treatment of periprosthetic fractures : new concepts in operative treatment].

D Wähnert, B Schliemann, M J Raschke, C Kösters

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Orthopade, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Traumatology in the elderly : Multimodal prevention of delirium and use of augmentation techniques].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D WähnertKlinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude W1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
B Schliemann
M J Raschke
C Kösters

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic fractures represent a common and complex challenge in the clinical practice in orthopedics and trauma surgery. Due to demographic changes characterized by increased life expectancy and higher numbers of primary arthroplasties, the number of periprosthetic fractures is increasing as well. Factors such as osteoporosis, multimorbidity and a highly active aging population additionally increase the complexity of periprosthetic fractures. INJURY PATTERNS: Most periprosthetic fractures affect the proximal and distal femur; however, periprosthetic fractures of the tibial head, the ankle, shoulders and the upper extremities as well as complex interprosthetic fractures pose an increasing challenge for orthopedic and trauma surgeons. THERAPY: Many therapeutic options exist and the number of implants especially designed to treat periprosthetic fractures is steadily rising. Principally, loosened prostheses are indicative for replacement operations whereas for periprosthetic fractures of well-anchored prostheses as a rule osteosynthesis is necessary. A standardized treatment algorithm does not yet exist and usually the decision of how to treat these fractures has to be made on an individual basis. PERSPECTIVES: The present article demonstrates the current state of open reduction and internal fixation of periprosthetic fractures with respect to biomechanical principles and furthermore provides an overview on implant augmentation.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, ReplacementCombined Modality TherapyDevice RemovalFracture Fixation, InternalHumansOsteotomyPeriprosthetic FracturesProsthesis DesignReoperation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.