Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24619331›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014

A comparison of NOTES transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures based upon task analysis.

Arun Nemani, Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, Jaisa S Olasky, Souheil Adra, Kurt E Roberts, Lucian Panait, Steven D Schwaitzberg, Daniel B Jones, Suvranu De

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Arun NemaniCenter for Modeling, Simulation and Imaging in Medicine (CeMSIM), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA, nemana@rpi.edu.
Ganesh Sankaranarayanan
Jaisa S Olasky
Souheil Adra
Kurt E Roberts
Lucian Panait
Steven D Schwaitzberg
Daniel B Jones
Suvranu De
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USHarvard University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCambridge Health Alliance · USDrexel University · USYale University · US

Funding

Physically Realistic Virtual SurgeryR01EB005807 · NIBIB · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI DE, SUVRANU, JACKSON, CULLEN DAVIS · 2006 to 2024
$7.0M
Developing Physics-Based Virtual Simulation Technology for Natural Orifice TranslR01EB009362 · NIBIB · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI CAO, CAROLINE GL, DE, SUVRANU · 2011 to 2014
$2.6M
Development and Validation of a Virtual Electrosurgical Skill Trainer (VEST)R01EB014305 · NIBIB · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI CAO, CAROLINE GL, DE, SUVRANU · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
Developing a Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST)R01EB010037 · NIBIB · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI CAO, CAROLINE GL, DE, SUVRANU · 2010 to 2013
$2.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS 1R01EB009362NIBIB NIH HHS 2R01EB00580NIBIB NIH HHS 5R01EB010037NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005807NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009362NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB010037NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA virtual reality-based simulator for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures may be used for training and discovery of new tools and procedures. Our previous study (Sankaranarayanan et al. in Surg Endosc 27:1607-1616, 2013) shows that developing such a simulator for the transvaginal cholecystectomy procedure using a rigid endoscope will have the most impact on the field. However, prior to developing such a simulator, a thorough task analysis is necessary to determine the most important phases, tasks, and subtasks of this procedure.

methods19 rigid endoscope transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy procedures and 11 traditional laparoscopic procedures have been recorded and de-identified prior to analysis. Hierarchical task analysis was conducted for the rigid endoscope transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy. A time series analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of the transvaginal NOTES and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. Finally, a comparison of electrosurgery-based errors was performed by two independent qualified personnel.

resultsThe most time-consuming tasks for both laparoscopic and NOTES cholecystectomy are removing areolar and connective tissue surrounding the gallbladder, exposing Calot's triangle, and dissecting the gallbladder off the liver bed with electrosurgery. There is a positive correlation of performance time between the removal of areolar and connective tissue and electrosurgery dissection tasks in NOTES (r = 0.415) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (r = 0.684) with p < 0.10. During the electrosurgery task, the NOTES procedures had fewer errors related to lack of progress in gallbladder removal. Contrarily, laparoscopic procedures had fewer errors due to the instrument being out of the camera view.

conclusionA thorough task analysis and video-based quantification of NOTES cholecystectomy has identified the most time-consuming tasks. A comparison of the surgical errors during electrosurgery gallbladder dissection establishes that the NOTES procedure, while still new, is not inferior to the established laparoscopic procedure.

Indexed as

Interrupted Time Series AnalysisCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicElectrosurgeryEndoscopesFemaleGallbladderHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryOperative TimeVaginaVideotape Recording

Identifiers

PMID24619331
PMCPMC4077992
OpenAlexW1998048164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.