Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2014
Randomized phase II trial of sorafenib alone or in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel in women with recurrent platinum sensitive epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.
Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Inefficiencies and Patient Burdens in the Development of the Targeted Cancer Drug Sorafenib: A Systematic Review.PLoS biology · 2017Pooled it
- Clinical outcome of treatment with serine-threonine kinase inhibitors in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review of literature.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2016Pooled it
- Anti-angiogenic therapy in ovarian cancer: Current understandings and prospects of precision medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Sorafenib inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation and mobility and induces radiosensitivity by targeting the tumor cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition.Open life sciences · 2022Article
- Antiangiogenic Strategies in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Mechanism, Resistance, and Combination Therapy.Journal of oncology · 2022Review
- Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- Targeted therapies in gynecological cancers: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020Review
- Tumor angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic gene therapy for cancer.Oncology letters · 2018Review
- Systemic therapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a clinical practice guideline.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2017Article
- The rise of genomic profiling in ovarian cancer.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2016Review
- Beyond Bevacizumab: An Outlook to New Anti-Angiogenics for the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background/purposeThis study was designed to evaluate the response and toxicity of sorafenib alone or when combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer (EOC).
methodsPatients with recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC with no more than 2 prior courses of chemotherapy were randomized to single-agent sorafenib 400 mg twice daily or combination sorafenib 400 mg bid (days 2-19) with IV carboplatin (AUC 6) and IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (S+C/T) every 3 weeks. Single agent sorafenib could cross over to combination upon progression.
resultsPatients were initially randomized to either arm, however, due to poor accrual, sorafenib arm was prematurely closed. A total of 13 patients were evaluable for response to sorafenib and 23 patients were evaluable for response to S+C/T. Objective response rate (RR) was 15 % for patients on sorafenib vs. 61 % for patients on S+C/T (p = 0.014); stable disease was seen in 62 % and 35 %, respectively. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 4 months (mos.) was 69 % for S and 65 % for S+C/T. The median progression free survival was 5.6 months on sorafenib vs. 16.8 months on S+C/T (p = 0.012) and there was no significant difference of overall survival between two arms (p = 0.974) with median overall survival 25.6 months under sorafenib vs. 25.9 months on S+C/T. Patients remained on trial for a median of 7.8 cycles on sorafenib and 5.4 cycles on S+C/T.
conclusionSorafenib, alone or in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, has activity in patients with platinum-sensitive EOC. Sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel improved RR and PFS; however, there were increased grade and frequencies of toxicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.