Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24619298›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2014

Randomized phase II trial of sorafenib alone or in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel in women with recurrent platinum sensitive epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.

Anita Schwandt, Vivian E von Gruenigen, Robert M Wenham, Heidi Frasure, Susan Eaton, Nancy Fusco, Pingfu Fu, John J Wright, Afshin Dowlati, Steven Waggoner

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The rise of genomic profiling in ovarian cancer.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2016
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Anita SchwandtCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Vivian E von Gruenigen
Robert M Wenham
Heidi Frasure
Susan Eaton
Nancy Fusco
Pingfu Fu
John J Wright
Afshin Dowlati
Steven Waggoner
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center · USUniversity School · USCase Western Reserve University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USSumma Akron City Hospital · US

Funding

Early Clinical Trials of New Anti-Cancer Agents with Phase I EmphasisU01CA062502 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DOWLATI, AFSHIN · 1994 to 2013
$9.3M
NCI NIH HHS U01-CA62502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeThis study was designed to evaluate the response and toxicity of sorafenib alone or when combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer (EOC).

methodsPatients with recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC with no more than 2 prior courses of chemotherapy were randomized to single-agent sorafenib 400 mg twice daily or combination sorafenib 400 mg bid (days 2-19) with IV carboplatin (AUC 6) and IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (S+C/T) every 3 weeks. Single agent sorafenib could cross over to combination upon progression.

resultsPatients were initially randomized to either arm, however, due to poor accrual, sorafenib arm was prematurely closed. A total of 13 patients were evaluable for response to sorafenib and 23 patients were evaluable for response to S+C/T. Objective response rate (RR) was 15 % for patients on sorafenib vs. 61 % for patients on S+C/T (p = 0.014); stable disease was seen in 62 % and 35 %, respectively. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 4 months (mos.) was 69 % for S and 65 % for S+C/T. The median progression free survival was 5.6 months on sorafenib vs. 16.8 months on S+C/T (p = 0.012) and there was no significant difference of overall survival between two arms (p = 0.974) with median overall survival 25.6 months under sorafenib vs. 25.9 months on S+C/T. Patients remained on trial for a median of 7.8 cycles on sorafenib and 5.4 cycles on S+C/T.

conclusionSorafenib, alone or in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, has activity in patients with platinum-sensitive EOC. Sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel improved RR and PFS; however, there were increased grade and frequencies of toxicities.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFallopian Tube NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNiacinamideOrganoplatinum CompoundsOvarian NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinNiacinamideOrganoplatinum CompoundsPaclitaxelPhenylurea CompoundsSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID24619298
OpenAlexW2011264584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.