Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24619223›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2014

Detection of borreliae in archived sera from patients with clinically suspect Lyme disease.

Sin Hang Lee, Jessica S Vigliotti, Veronica S Vigliotti, William Jones, David M Shearer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Quantitative multiplexed strategies for human Lyme disease serological testing.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in medicine · 2020
    Article
  6. Lyme Disease Frontiers: ReconcilingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Single Core Genome Sequencing for Detection of bothInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  9. Direct Diagnostic Tests for Lyme Disease.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of two commercially available rapid diagnostic tests for Lyme borreliosis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sin Hang LeeDepartment of Pathology, Milford Hospital, 300 Seaside Ave., Milford, CT 06460, USA. shlee01@snet.net.
Jessica S VigliottiDepartment of Pathology, Milford Hospital, 300 Seaside Ave., Milford, CT 06460, USA. jessvigs@yahoo.com.
Veronica S VigliottiDepartment of Pathology, Milford Hospital, 300 Seaside Ave., Milford, CT 06460, USA. ronnie313vig@yahoo.com.
William JonesDepartment of Pathology, Milford Hospital, 300 Seaside Ave., Milford, CT 06460, USA. will.jones@milfordhospital.org.
David M ShearerTherapeutic Research Foundation, Old Saybrook, CT 06475, USA. dshearer@tr-f.org.
Milford Hospital · USTherapeutic Research Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnoses of Lyme disease based on clinical manifestations, serological findings and detection of infectious agents often contradict each other. We tested 52 blind-coded serum samples, including 20 pre-treatment and 12 post-treatment sera from clinically suspect Lyme disease patients, for the presence of residual Lyme disease infectious agents, using nested PCR amplification of a signature segment of the borrelial 16S ribosomal RNA gene for detection and direct DNA sequencing of the PCR amplicon for molecular validation. These archived sera were split from the samples drawn for the 2-tier serology tests performed by a CDC-approved laboratory, and are used as reference materials for evaluating new diagnostic reagents. Of the 12 post-treatment serum samples, we found DNA evidence of a novel borrelia of uncertain significance in one, which was also positive for the 2-tier serology test. The rest of the post-treatment sera and all 20 control sera were PCR-negative. Of the 20 pre-treatment sera from clinically suspect early Lyme disease patients, we found Borrelia miyamotoi in one which was 2-tier serology-negative, and a Borrelia burgdorferi in two-one negative and one positive for 2-tier serology. We conclude that a sensitive and reliable DNA-based test is needed to support the diagnosis of Lyme disease and Lyme disease-like borreliosis.

Indexed as

Base SequenceBorreliaClinical Laboratory TechniquesDNA, BacterialHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansLyme DiseaseMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID24619223
PMCPMC3975398
OpenAlexW1971096302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.