Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24619182›Full record

ReviewHeredity2014

Using next-generation RNA sequencing to identify imprinted genes.

X Wang, A G Clark

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heredity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Defects of Epigenetic Reprogramming in Dox-Dependent Porcine-iPSCs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

X Wang1] Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA [2] Cornell Center for Comparative and Population Genomics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
A G Clark1] Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA [2] Cornell Center for Comparative and Population Genomics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Cornell University · US

Funding

TAKASHIMA DIVERSITY SUPPLEMENT TO: REGULATION OF GAMETE USE AND NEURAL PATHWAYS IN REPRODUCTIONR01HD059060 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREW G CLARK, Mariana Federica Wolfner · 2009 to 2026
$5.8M
Functional /Comparative Genomic of Drosophila immunityR01AI064950 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI CLARK, ANDREW G, LAZZARO, BRIAN · 2005 to 2016
$3.7M
Molecular Evolution of Drosophila Y ChromosomeR01GM064590 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI CARVALHO, ANTONIO BERNARDO, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2002 to 2012
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064950NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059060NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064590NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM64590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting is manifested as differential allelic expression (DAE) depending on the parent-of-origin. The most direct way to identify imprinted genes is to directly score the DAE in a context where one can identify which parent transmitted each allele. Because many genes display DAE, simply scoring DAE in an individual is not sufficient to identify imprinted genes. In this paper, we outline many technical aspects of a scheme for identification of imprinted genes that makes use of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) from tissues isolated from F1 offspring derived from the pair of reciprocal crosses. Ideally, the parental lines are from two inbred strains that are not closely related to each other. Aspects of tissue purity, RNA extraction, library preparation and bioinformatic inference of imprinting are all covered. These methods have already been applied in a number of organisms, and one of the most striking results is the evolutionary fluidity with which novel imprinted genes are gained and lost within genomes. The general methodology is also applicable to a wide range of other biological problems that require quantification of allele-specific expression using RNA-seq, such as cis-regulation of gene expression, X chromosome inactivation and random monoallelic expression.

Indexed as

AllelesGenomic ImprintingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, RNAAnimalsAnimals, Inbred StrainsComputational BiologyCrosses, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGene LibraryGenomicsHumansMalePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID24619182
PMCPMC4105452
OpenAlexW2022914350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.