ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2014
Effects of a typical acute oral calcium load on arterial properties and endothelial function in healthy subjects.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute effects of calcium supplements on blood pressure: randomised, crossover trial in postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017Trial
- Can we reverse arterial stiffness by intervening on CKD-MBD biomarkers?Clinical kidney journal · 2023Review
- Effects of a High-Protein Diet on Cardiometabolic Health, Vascular Function, and Endocannabinoids-A PREVIEW Study.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Coronary vasomotor responses to isometric handgrip exercise are primarily mediated by nitric oxide: a noninvasive MRI test of coronary endothelial function.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesOften recommended, calcium supplements have been incriminated as increasing the risk of cardiovascular events, whereas dietary calcium has generally been exonerated. As a first step to address the vascular safety of such dietary measures at the clinical nutritionist toolbox, we sought to determine and compare the acute effects of a typical oral calcium load, provided either as a supplement or as food, on vascular parameters assessed noninvasively in healthy subjects. SUBJECTS/
methodsIn this acute, cross-over, random-order intervention, 11 young and healthy vitamin D-sufficient volunteers (8 women/3 men, 33±6.1 years, body mass index 22.6±2.3 kg/m(2)), ingested 600 mg of calcium twice, once as calcium citrate and the other time from dairy products. Biochemical, vascular and hemodynamic parameters, before and 2 h after each challenge, were compared. Arterial stiffness was studied by measuring pulse wave velocity, augmentation index and large (C1) and small (C2) arterial compliance. Endothelial function was assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD).
resultsDespite effective calcium loading accompanied by a significant 60% parathyroid hormone level reduction on both occasions, there were no clinically significant changes in the vascular parameters neither in comparison with baseline, nor between the studies. A decrease in heart rate with no change in cardiac output was noticed after the supplement.
conclusionsAn effective calcium load has no clinically significant untoward effect on the vascular properties of young healthy subjects, regardless of its source. Additional studies should determine whether this holds true for chronic calcium supplementation, particularly in subjects with a priori vascular impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24619106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.