Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24619092›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Separation of on-target efficacy from adverse effects through rational design of a bitopic adenosine receptor agonist.

Celine Valant, Lauren T May, Luigi Aurelio, Chung Hui Chuo, Paul J White, Jo-Anne Baltos, Patrick M Sexton, Peter J Scammells, Arthur Christopoulos

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From empirical screening to lipid trolling: the evolution of extrahelical allosteric modulators of AMedicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Biased Allosteric Modulation in GPCR Drug Discovery.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Structure-based discovery of positive allosteric modulators of the AProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The effect of two selective ABritish journal of pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Celine ValantDrug Discovery Biology and Department of Pharmacology and Medicinal Chemistry, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Lauren T May
Luigi Aurelio
Chung Hui Chuo
Paul J White
Jo-Anne Baltos
Patrick M Sexton
Peter J Scammells
Arthur Christopoulos
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concepts of allosteric modulation and biased agonism are revolutionizing modern approaches to drug discovery, particularly in the field of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Both phenomena exploit topographically distinct binding sites to promote unique GPCR conformations that can lead to different patterns of cellular responsiveness. The adenosine A1 GPCR (A1AR) is a major therapeutic target for cardioprotection, but current agents acting on the receptor are clinically limited for this indication because of on-target bradycardia as a serious adverse effect. In the current study, we have rationally designed a novel A1AR ligand (VCP746)--a hybrid molecule comprising adenosine linked to a positive allosteric modulator--specifically to engender biased signaling at the A1AR. We validate that the interaction of VCP746 with the A1AR is consistent with a bitopic mode of receptor engagement (i.e., concomitant association with orthosteric and allosteric sites) and that the compound displays biased agonism relative to prototypical A1AR ligands. Importantly, we also show that the unique pharmacology of VCP746 is (patho)physiologically relevant, because the compound protects against ischemic insult in native A1AR-expressing cardiomyoblasts and cardiomyocytes but does not affect rat atrial heart rate. Thus, this study provides proof of concept that bitopic ligands can be designed as biased agonists to promote on-target efficacy without on-target side effects.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAdenosineAllosteric SiteAnimalsCells, CulturedCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusLigandsPurinergic P1 Receptor AgonistsRatsThiophenesAdenosineLigandsPurinergic P1 Receptor AgonistsThiophenesVCP746

Identifiers

PMID24619092
PMCPMC3970544
OpenAlexW1972870079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.