Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24618826›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Elevated plasma D-dimer levels correlate with long term survival of gastric cancer patients.

Long Liu, Xi Zhang, Bing Yan, Qunhao Gu, Xiaodong Zhang, Jianpeng Jiao, Dazhi Sun, Ning Wang, Xiaoqiang Yue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Long LiuDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xi ZhangDepartment of Anatomy, Second Military Medical University, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Bing YanDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Qunhao GuDepartment of General Surgery, Yueyang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaodong ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Yueyang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jianpeng JiaoDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Dazhi SunDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ning WangDepartment of Oncology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoqiang YueDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Second Military Medical University · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNChanghai Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing evidence indicated plasma D-dimer could be regarded as a marker in cancers, however, its role in gastric cancer is still largely unknown.

methodsPlasma D-dimer levels were measured by enzyme linked fluorescent immunoassays and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer and healthy subjects. The overall survival (OS) characteristics were determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.

resultsThe average of the plasma D-dimer levels for gastric cancer patients was significantly higher than the healthy subjects. A Spearman correlation analysis showed that plasma D-dimer levels correlated with the depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, peritoneal dissemination, distant metastasis, tumor size and TNM stage. The mean plasma D-dimer level was 2.20 ± 1.51 µg/mL in peritoneal dissemination patients and 1.01 ± 0.79 µg/mL in non-peritoneal dissemination patients (P<0.001). Additionally, the mean plasma D-dimer concentration in patients alive at the final follow-up evaluation was 0.79 ± 0.72 µg/mL,which was significantly lower than the amounts determined for the deceased patients (1.36 ± 1.13 µg/mL) (P<0.001). The AUC of D-dimer was 0.833 (95%CI: 0.780-0.885). At a cut-off value of 1.465 µg/mL, the D-dimer measurement had a sensitivity of 78.00%, a specificity of 83.76% and an accuracy of 82.59%. The median OS was 48.10 months (95% CI: 43.88-52.31) in patients with plasma D-dimer levels less than 1.465 µg/mL and 22.39 months (95% CI: 16.95-27.82) in patients with plasma D-dimer levels exceeding 1.465 µg/mL (log-rank test, P<0.001). Importantly, plasma D-dimer levels exceeding 1.465 µg/mL were significantly associated with poor OS, as determined using a multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.28; 95%CI: 1.36-3.81; P = 0.002).

conclusionsPlasma D-dimer levels are increased in gastric cancer patients and may be a valuable biomarker for peritoneal dissemination, with high D-dimer levels predicting poor outcomes for gastric cancer patients.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPeritoneal NeoplasmsPrognosisROC CurveStomach NeoplasmsTumor BurdenBiomarkersFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment D

Identifiers

PMID24618826
PMCPMC3949713
OpenAlexW2038747378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.