ArticlePloS one2014
Elevated plasma D-dimer levels correlate with long term survival of gastric cancer patients.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship of D-dimer with survival and metastasis in gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- The D-dimer level predicts the prognosis in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2021Pooled it
- High pretreatment plasma D-dimer levels predict poor prognosis in gastrointestinal cancers: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Biochemical and haemostatic variables associated with metastasis in dogs with carcinoma or sarcoma.The Journal of small animal practice · 2026Article
- Optimal D-dimer value for acute deep vein thrombosis screening in the lower limb in cases with carcinomas.Medicine · 2025Observational
- D-dimer drives immune dysregulation in COVID-19 via chemokine modulation and inflammatory signaling.Virus research · 2025Article
- Status quo of hypercoagulation as a prognostic indicator following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Coagulation markers as independent predictors of colorectal cancer aggressiveness.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- D-dimer predicts the response of patients with gastric cancer to first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- The Impact of Coagulation Biomarkers on Survival Outcomes in Adult Glioblastoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using plasma D-dimer levels.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Preoperative D‑dimer level and prognosis in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer and undergoing gastric cancer radical surgery: A retrospective cohort study.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of a Novel Index Combining the Prognostic Nutritional Index and D-Dimer Levels for Gastric Cancer after Gastrectomy.Oncology · 2025Article
- A nomogram combining neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) to predict distant metastasis in gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Association Between D-Dimer Levels and Recurrence in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer after Surgical Treatment.International journal of women's health · 2024Article
- Relationship Between Coagulation and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2024Review
- Disposable Voltammetric Immunosensor for D-Dimer Detection as Early Biomarker of Thromboembolic Disease and of COVID-19 Prognosis.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Hemostasis and cancer: Impact of haemostatic biomarkers for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with cancer.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2022Review
- Do coagulation or fibrinolysis reflect the disease condition in patients with soft tissue sarcoma?BMC cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing evidence indicated plasma D-dimer could be regarded as a marker in cancers, however, its role in gastric cancer is still largely unknown.
methodsPlasma D-dimer levels were measured by enzyme linked fluorescent immunoassays and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer and healthy subjects. The overall survival (OS) characteristics were determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.
resultsThe average of the plasma D-dimer levels for gastric cancer patients was significantly higher than the healthy subjects. A Spearman correlation analysis showed that plasma D-dimer levels correlated with the depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, peritoneal dissemination, distant metastasis, tumor size and TNM stage. The mean plasma D-dimer level was 2.20 ± 1.51 µg/mL in peritoneal dissemination patients and 1.01 ± 0.79 µg/mL in non-peritoneal dissemination patients (P<0.001). Additionally, the mean plasma D-dimer concentration in patients alive at the final follow-up evaluation was 0.79 ± 0.72 µg/mL,which was significantly lower than the amounts determined for the deceased patients (1.36 ± 1.13 µg/mL) (P<0.001). The AUC of D-dimer was 0.833 (95%CI: 0.780-0.885). At a cut-off value of 1.465 µg/mL, the D-dimer measurement had a sensitivity of 78.00%, a specificity of 83.76% and an accuracy of 82.59%. The median OS was 48.10 months (95% CI: 43.88-52.31) in patients with plasma D-dimer levels less than 1.465 µg/mL and 22.39 months (95% CI: 16.95-27.82) in patients with plasma D-dimer levels exceeding 1.465 µg/mL (log-rank test, P<0.001). Importantly, plasma D-dimer levels exceeding 1.465 µg/mL were significantly associated with poor OS, as determined using a multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.28; 95%CI: 1.36-3.81; P = 0.002).
conclusionsPlasma D-dimer levels are increased in gastric cancer patients and may be a valuable biomarker for peritoneal dissemination, with high D-dimer levels predicting poor outcomes for gastric cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.