Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24618681›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A laboratory-based evaluation of four rapid point-of-care tests for syphilis.

Louise M Causer, John M Kaldor, Christopher K Fairley, Basil Donovan, Theo Karapanagiotidis, David E Leslie, Peter W Robertson, Anna M McNulty, David Anderson, Handan Wand and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Point-of-care Tests for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Review of the Literature.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Metaanalysis of the Performance of a Combined Treponemal and Nontreponemal Rapid Diagnostic Test for Syphilis and Yaws.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network guidelines for the use of point-of-care tests forJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Vaccine development for syphilis.Expert review of vaccines · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network laboratory guidelines for the use of point-of-care tests for the diagnosis of syphilis in Canada.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Louise M CauserKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
John M KaldorKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Christopher K FairleySchool of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Basil DonovanKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Theo KarapanagiotidisVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia.
David E LeslieVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter W RobertsonSEALS Area Serology Laboratory, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia.
Anna M McNultySydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney, Australia.
David AndersonBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Handan WandKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Damian P ConwayKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Ian DenhamMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Carlton, Australia.
Claire RyanBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Rebecca J GuyKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUBurnet Institute · AUVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory · AUMelbourne Sexual Health Centre · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AUSydney Sexual Health Centre · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSyphilis point-of-care tests may reduce morbidity and ongoing transmission by increasing the proportion of people rapidly treated. Syphilis stage and co-infection with HIV may influence test performance. We evaluated four commercially available syphilis point-of-care devices in a head-to-head comparison using sera from laboratories in Australia.

methodsPoint-of-care tests were evaluated using sera stored at Sydney and Melbourne laboratories. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by standard methods, comparing point-of-care results to treponemal immunoassay (IA) reference test results. Additional analyses by clinical syphilis stage, HIV status, and non-treponemal antibody titre were performed. Non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals (CI) were considered statistically significant differences in estimates.

resultsIn total 1203 specimens were tested (736 IA-reactive, 467 IA-nonreactive). Point-of-care test sensitivities were: Determine 97.3%(95%CI:95.8-98.3), Onsite 92.5%(90.3-94.3), DPP 89.8%(87.3-91.9) and Bioline 87.8%(85.1-90.0). Specificities were: Determine 96.4%(94.1-97.8), Onsite 92.5%(90.3-94.3), DPP 98.3%(96.5-99.2), and Bioline 98.5%(96.8-99.3). Sensitivity of the Determine test was 100% for primary and 100% for secondary syphilis. The three other tests had reduced sensitivity among primary (80.4-90.2%) compared to secondary syphilis (94.3-98.6%). No significant differences in sensitivity were observed by HIV status. Test sensitivities were significantly higher among high-RPR titre (RPR ≥ 8) (range: 94.6-99.5%) than RPR non-reactive infections (range: 76.3-92.9%).

conclusionsThe Determine test had the highest sensitivity overall. All tests were most sensitive among high-RPR titre infections. Point-of-care tests have a role in syphilis control programs however in developed countries with established laboratory infrastructures, the lower sensitivities of some tests observed in primary syphilis suggest these would need to be supplemented with additional tests among populations where syphilis incidence is high to avoid missing early syphilis cases.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCoinfectionFemaleHIV SeropositivityHumansMaleMiddle AgedReagent Kits, DiagnosticRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificitySyphilisReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID24618681
PMCPMC3950184
OpenAlexW2056229249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.