Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24618483›Full record

Trial reportIndian journal of ophthalmology2014

Effectiveness of the addition of citicoline to patching in the treatment of amblyopia around visual maturity: a randomized controlled trial.

Prachee Vasant Pawar, Sachin S Mumbare, Mrunal Suresh Patil, Seema Ramakrishnan

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Neuroprotection beyond intraocular pressure: game changer or quiet addiction.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Cholinergic modulation of sensory perception and plasticity.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023
    Review
  10. Comprehensive review of amblyopia: Types and management.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  11. The Role of Citicoline and Coenzyme Q10 in Retinal Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Current Management of Childhood Amblyopia.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prachee Vasant PawarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Center, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Sachin S Mumbare
Mrunal Suresh Patil
Seema Ramakrishnan
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo study the effectiveness of the addition of citicoline to patching in the treatment of amblyopia in the age group of 4-13 years. MATERIALS AND

methodsA randomized controlled trial, which included patients who were randomly divided into two groups. Both the groups received patching therapy till plateau was achieved in phase 1 of the study. Then in phase 2, group I received citicoline plus patching and group II continued to receive only patching. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome was measured by the visual acuity in logMAR every month in phase 1 till plateau was achieved and then for 12 months in phase 2.

resultsNo significant difference was found in the mean visual acuities in these two groups in phase 1 till plateau was reached. In phase 2, for the initial four months, there was no significant difference in the visual acuities in these two groups, at the respective intervals. However, five months onward, up to 12 months, there was a significant difference in the visual acuities in these groups.The result was the same in younger patients (< seven years of age) as well as in older patients (> seven years of age). In phase 2, the mean proportional improvement in group I was significantly more than that in group II, at two months and onward, at the respective intervals.

conclusionThe improvement in visual acuity with citicoline plus patching was significantly more than that with patching alone, in one year of treatment.

Indexed as

Sensory DeprivationVisual AcuityAdolescentAmblyopiaChildChild, PreschoolCytidine Diphosphate CholineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNootropic AgentsOphthalmic SolutionsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsCytidine Diphosphate CholineNootropic AgentsOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID24618483
PMCPMC4005224
OpenAlexW1966245881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.