ArticleBMC genomics2014
Billions of basepairs of recently expanded, repetitive sequences are eliminated from the somatic genome during copepod development.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The enigma of the B chromosome-specific behaviour.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Distinct satellite DNA composition between core and germline restricted chromosomes in Bradysia (Sciara) coprophila.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Functions and mechanisms of eukaryotic RNA-guided programmed DNA elimination.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
- Article
- The nematode Oscheius tipulae as a genetic model for programmed DNA elimination.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Delete and survive: strategies of programmed genetic material elimination in eukaryotes.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022Review
- Gene-rich germline-restricted chromosomes in black-winged fungus gnats evolved through hybridization.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Programmed DNA elimination: silencing genes and repetitive sequences in somatic cells.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021Review
- Evolutionary Perspectives on Germline-Restricted Chromosomes in Flies (Diptera).Genome biology and evolution · 2021Review
- Characterization and Evolution of Germ1, an Element that Undergoes Diminution in Lampreys (Cyclostomata: Petromyzontidae).Journal of molecular evolution · 2019Article
- Comparative genome analysis of programmed DNA elimination in nematodes.Genome research · 2017Article
- Somatic transposition and meiotically driven elimination of an active helitron family in Pleurotus ostreatus.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017Article
- Structure of the germline genome ofeLife · 2016Article
- Mobile genetic elements: in silico, in vitro, in vivo.Molecular ecology · 2016Article
- An epigenetic toolkit allows for diverse genome architectures in eukaryotes.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015Review
- TFIIS-Dependent Non-coding Transcription Regulates Developmental Genome Rearrangements.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Programmed DNA elimination in multicellular organisms.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2014Review
- EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT AND A QUANTITATIVE MODEL OF PROGRAMMED DNA ELIMINATION INJournal of crustacean biology : a quarterly of the Crustacean Society for the publication of research on any aspect of the biology of crustaceaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChromatin diminution is the programmed deletion of DNA from presomatic cell or nuclear lineages during development, producing single organisms that contain two different nuclear genomes. Phylogenetically diverse taxa undergo chromatin diminution--some ciliates, nematodes, copepods, and vertebrates. In cyclopoid copepods, chromatin diminution occurs in taxa with massively expanded germline genomes; depending on species, germline genome sizes range from 15 - 75 Gb, 12-74 Gb of which are lost from pre-somatic cell lineages at germline--soma differentiation. This is more than an order of magnitude more sequence than is lost from other taxa. To date, the sequences excised from copepods have not been analyzed using large-scale genomic datasets, and the processes underlying germline genomic gigantism in this clade, as well as the functional significance of chromatin diminution, have remained unknown.
resultsHere, we used high-throughput genomic sequencing and qPCR to characterize the germline and somatic genomes of Mesocyclops edax, a freshwater cyclopoid copepod with a germline genome of ~15 Gb and a somatic genome of ~3 Gb. We show that most of the excised DNA consists of repetitive sequences that are either 1) verifiable transposable elements (TEs), or 2) non-simple repeats of likely TE origin. Repeat elements in both genomes are skewed towards younger (i.e. less divergent) elements. Excised DNA is a non-random sample of the germline repeat element landscape; younger elements, and high frequency DNA transposons and LINEs, are disproportionately eliminated from the somatic genome.
conclusionsOur results suggest that germline genome expansion in M. edax reflects explosive repeat element proliferation, and that billions of base pairs of such repeats are deleted from the somatic genome every generation. Thus, we hypothesize that chromatin diminution is a mechanism that controls repeat element load, and that this load can evolve to be divergent between tissue types within single organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.