Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24618227›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in neurobiology2014

The receptive field is dead. Long live the receptive field?

Adrienne Fairhall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Teaching Computation in Neuroscience: Notes on the 2019 Society for Neuroscience Professional Development Workshop on Teaching.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Flow stimuli reveal ecologically appropriate responses in mouse visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Motor control by precisely timed spike patterns.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. From the neuron doctrine to neural networks.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2015
    Review
  12. eNeuro
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adrienne FairhallDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific St., HSB G424, Box 357290, Seattle, WA 98195-7290, USA. Electronic address: fairhall@u.washington.edu.

Funding

CRCNS: Decision-making in flying insects using multisensory cuesR01DC013693 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DICKINSON, MICHAEL H, FAIRHALL, ADRIENNE L · 2013 to 2016
$1.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013693NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC013693-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in experimental techniques, including behavioral paradigms using rich stimuli under closed loop conditions and the interfacing of neural systems with external inputs and outputs, reveal complex dynamics in the neural code and require a revisiting of standard concepts of representation. High-throughput recording and imaging methods along with the ability to observe and control neuronal subpopulations allow increasingly detailed access to the neural circuitry that subserves neural representations and the computations they support. How do we harness theory to build biologically grounded models of complex neural function?

Indexed as

Nervous System Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsHumansNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerSensation

Identifiers

PMID24618227
PMCPMC4043224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.