Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24618211›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2014

In silico identification and experimental validation of insertion-deletion polymorphisms in tomato genome.

Jingjing Yang, Yuanyuan Wang, Huolin Shen, Wencai Yang

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Plasticity of maternal environment-dependent expression-QTLs of tomato seeds.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  8. Vegetable biology and breeding in the genomics era.Science China. Life sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome-Wide Discovery of InDel Markers in Sesame (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  13. Transcription of lncRNARNA biology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingjing YangBeijing Key Laboratory of Growth and Developmental Regulation for Protected Vegetable Crops, Department of Vegetable Science, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan Xilu, Beijing 100193, China.
Yuanyuan WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Growth and Developmental Regulation for Protected Vegetable Crops, Department of Vegetable Science, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan Xilu, Beijing 100193, China.
Huolin ShenBeijing Key Laboratory of Growth and Developmental Regulation for Protected Vegetable Crops, Department of Vegetable Science, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan Xilu, Beijing 100193, China.
Wencai YangBeijing Key Laboratory of Growth and Developmental Regulation for Protected Vegetable Crops, Department of Vegetable Science, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan Xilu, Beijing 100193, China yangwencai@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative analysis of the genome sequences of Solanum lycopersicum variety Heinz 1706 and S. pimpinellifolium accession LA 1589 using MUGSY software identified 145 695 insertion-deletion (InDel) polymorphisms. A selected set of 3029 candidate InDels (≥2 bp) across the entire tomato genome were subjected to PCR validation, and 82.4% could be verified. Of 2272 polymorphic InDels between LA 1589 and Heinz 1706, 61.6, 45.2, and 31.6% were polymorphic in 8 accessions of S. pimpinellifolium, 4 accessions of S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme, and 10 varieties of S. lycopersicum, respectively. Genetic distance was 0.216 in S. pimpinellifolium, 0.202 in S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme, and 0.108 in S. lycopersicum. The data suggested a reduction of genetic variation from S. pimpinellifolium to S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme and S. lycopersicum. Cluster analysis showed that the 8 accessions of S. pimpinellifolium were in one group, whereas 4 accessions of S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme and 10 varieties of S. lycopersicum were in the same group.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationGenome, PlantINDEL MutationPolymorphism, GeneticGenetic MarkersSolanumSolanum lycopersicumGenetic Markersgenetic variationinsertion–deletionSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID24618211
PMCPMC4131836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.