Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24616572›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: a surgeon's perspective.

Avanish P Saklani, Sung Uk Bae, Amy Clayton, Nam Kyu Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Optimizing the Personalized Care for the Management of Rectal Cancer: A Consensus Statement.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Radiomic Features of Primary Rectal Cancers on Baseline TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Avanish P SaklaniAvanish P Saklani, Sung Uk Bae, Nam Kyu Kim, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120527, South Korea.
Sung Uk BaeAvanish P Saklani, Sung Uk Bae, Nam Kyu Kim, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120527, South Korea.
Amy ClaytonAvanish P Saklani, Sung Uk Bae, Nam Kyu Kim, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120527, South Korea.
Nam Kyu KimAvanish P Saklani, Sung Uk Bae, Nam Kyu Kim, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120527, South Korea.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer was first investigated in 1999 and has become almost mandatory in planning rectal cancer treatment. MRI has a high accuracy in predicting circumferential resection margin involvement and is used to plan neoadjuvant therapy. The accuracy of MRI in assessing mesorectal lymph nodes remains moderate, as there are no reliable criteria to assess nodal involvement. MRI seems to be good in assessing peritoneal involvement in upper rectal cancer; this however has been assessed in only a few studies and needs further research. For low rectal cancers, mesorectum is thin at the level of levator ani especially in relation to prostate; so predicting circumferential resection margin involvement is not easy. However high spatial resolution coronal imaging shows levator muscles, sphincter complex and intersphincteric plane accurately. This is used to stage low rectal tumors and plan plane of surgery (standard surgery, intersphincteric resection, Extralevator abdominoperineal resection). While most centres perform MRI post chemoradiotherapy, its role in accurate staging post neoadjuvant therapy remains debatable. THe role of Diffusion weighted MRI post neoadjuvant therapy is being evaluated in research settings.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingChemoradiotherapyDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFerric CompoundsHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingRectal NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsTreatment OutcomeFerric Compoundsferric oxideMagnetic resonance imagingRectal cancerSurgeon

Identifiers

PMID24616572
PMCPMC3934473
OpenAlexW1968987814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.