ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2016
Fluorescent imaging of endothelial cells in bioengineered blood vessels: the impact of crosslinking of the scaffold.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinspired Polymeric Scaffolds for Improvement of Angiogenesis and Tissue Engineering: A Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Tunable Bioresorbable Scaffolds With Marine Sulfated Polysaccharides for Small-Caliber Vascular Grafts: A Multi-Layered Strategy Combining Electrospinning and 4-Axis Printing.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Fiber-based platform for synchronous imaging of endogenous and exogenous fluorescence of biological tissue.Optics letters · 2019Article
- Fiber-based fluorescence lifetime imaging of recellularization processes on vascular tissue constructs.Journal of biophotonics · 2018Article
- Imaging Cell Viability on Non-transparent Scaffolds - Using the Example of a Novel Knitted Titanium Implant.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescent imaging is a useful tool to monitor and evaluate bioengineered tissues and organs. However, autofluorescence emitted from the scaffold can be comparable or even overwhelm signals generated by fluorescently labelled cells and biomarkers. Using standard fluorescent microscopy techniques, a simple and easy-to-measure signal to noise ratio metric was developed, which can facilitate the selection of fluorescent biomarkers and the respective biomaterials for tissue engineering studies. Endothelial cells (MS1) expressing green-fluorescent protein and red fluorescent protein (mKate) were seeded on poly(epsilon-caprolactone)-collagen hybrid scaffolds that were prepared by crosslinking with glutaraldehyde, genipin and ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide. All scaffolds had comparable mechanical properties, which could meet the requirements for vascular graft applications. ethyl(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide crosslinked scaffolds had a high signal to noise ratio value because of its low autofluorescence in green and red channels. Genipin crosslinked scaffolds had a high signal to noise ratio only in the green channel, while glutaraldehyde crosslinked scaffolds had a low signal to noise ratio in both green and red channels. The signal to noise ratio was independent of the exposure time. The data show that although similar in their mechanical properties and ability to support cell growth, scaffolds crosslinked with different agents have significant differences in causing autofluorescence of the scaffolds. This result indicates that scaffold's preparation method may have a significant impact on direct imaging of fluorescently labelled cells on scaffolds used for tissue engineering. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.