Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24616037›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2014

Mechanisms of chromosomal instability in melanoma.

William K Kaufmann, Craig C Carson, Bernard Omolo, Adam J Filgo, Maria J Sambade, Dennis A Simpson, Janiel M Shields, Joseph G Ibrahim, Nancy E Thomas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Novel assay to measure chromosome instability identifiesFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William K KaufmannDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Environmental Health and Susceptibility, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Craig C Carson
Bernard Omolo
Adam J Filgo
Maria J Sambade
Dennis A Simpson
Janiel M Shields
Joseph G Ibrahim
Nancy E Thomas
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCenter for Environmental Health · USUniversity of South Carolina Upstate · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
TOXICOLOGYT32ES007126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ILONA JASPERS, Bernard E. Weissman · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
The System of Response to DNA Damage Suppresses Environmental MelanomagenesisP01ES014635 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SANCAR, AZIZ · 2007 to 2011
$6.7M
Biostatistics for Research in Genomics and CancerT32CA106209 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JOSEPH G IBRAHIM, Naim Ur Rashid · 2004 to 2026
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA106209NCI NIH HHS CA16086NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS T32 CA106209NIEHS NIH HHS ES007126NIEHS NIH HHS ES10126NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES014635NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systems biology approach was applied to investigate the mechanisms of chromosomal instability in melanoma cell lines. Chromosomal instability was quantified using array comparative genomic hybridization to identify somatic copy number alterations (deletions and duplications). Primary human melanocytes displayed an average of 8.5 alterations per cell primarily representing known polymorphisms. Melanoma cell lines displayed 25 to 131 alterations per cell, with an average of 68, indicative of chromosomal instability. Copy number alterations included approximately equal numbers of deletions and duplications with greater numbers of hemizygous (-1,+1) alterations than homozygous (-2,+2). Melanoma oncogenes, such as BRAF and MITF, and tumor suppressor genes, such as CDKN2A/B and PTEN, were included in these alterations. Duplications and deletions were functional as there were significant correlations between DNA copy number and mRNA expression for these genes. Spectral karyotype analysis of three lines confirmed extensive chromosomal instability with polyploidy, aneuploidy, deletions, duplications, and chromosome rearrangements. Bioinformatic analysis identified a signature of gene expression that was correlated with chromosomal instability but this signature provided no clues to the mechanisms of instability. The signature failed to generate a significant (P = 0.105) prediction of melanoma progression in a separate dataset. Chromosomal instability was not correlated with elements of DNA damage response (DDR) such as radiosensitivity, nucleotide excision repair, expression of the DDR biomarkers γH2AX and P-CHEK2, nor G1 or G2 checkpoint function. Chromosomal instability in melanoma cell lines appears to influence gene function but it is not simply explained by alterations in the system of DDR.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorChromosomal InstabilityComparative Genomic HybridizationComputational BiologyDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA DamageHumansKaryotypingMelanomaOncogenesSystems BiologycheckpointDNA damage responsegenetic instabilitymelanomaprognosisrepair

Identifiers

PMID24616037
PMCPMC4128338
OpenAlexW1892699484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.