Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24615955›Full record

ArticleBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2014

The rise and fall of Picobiliphytes: how assumed autotrophs turned out to be heterotrophs.

David Moreira, Purificación López-García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The sizes of life.PloS one · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Niche adaptation promoted the evolutionary diversification of tiny ocean predators.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David MoreiraUnité d'Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, CNRS UMR8079, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France.
Purificación López-García

Funding

European Research Council 322669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Algae are significant members of Earth's biodiversity. Having been studied for a long time, the discovery of new algal phyla is extremely unusual. Recently, the enigmatic "Picobiliphyta," a group of uncultured eukaryotes unveiled using molecular tools, were claimed to represent an unrecognized early branching algal lineage with a nucleomorph (remnant nucleus of a secondary algal endosymbiont) in their plastids. However, subsequent studies rejected the presence of a nucleomorph, and single-cell genomic studies failed to detect any plastid-related genes, ruling out the possibility of plastid occurrence. The isolation of the first "picobiliphyte," Picomonas judraskeda, a tiny organism that feeds on very small (<150 nm) organic particles, came as final proof of their non-photosynthetic lifestyle. Consequently, the group has been renamed Picozoa. The passage from "picobiliphytes" to "picozoa" illustrates the crucial role that classical protistology should play to provide sound biological context for the wealth of data produced by modern molecular techniques.

Indexed as

Autotrophic ProcessesHeterotrophic ProcessesBase SequenceEukaryotaGenomicsOceans and SeasPhylogenyPlastidsSingle-Cell Analysisalgaeeukaryotic evolutionphylogenyPicobiliphytePicozoaprotist

Identifiers

PMID24615955
PMCPMC4133654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.