Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24615598›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2014

The effect of certification and accreditation on quality management in 4 clinical services in 73 European hospitals.

Charles D Shaw, Oliver Groene, Daan Botje, Rosa Sunol, Basia Kutryba, Niek Klazinga, Charles Bruneau, Antje Hammer, Aolin Wang, Onyebuchi A Arah and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
24.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

Charles D Shaw* Centre for Clinical Governance Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. cdshaw@btinternet.com.
Oliver Groene
Daan Botje
Rosa Sunol
Basia Kutryba
Niek Klazinga
Charles Bruneau
Antje Hammer
Aolin Wang
Onyebuchi A Arah
Cordula Wagner
DUQuE Project Consortium
University of Cologne · DEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USCenter For Policy Research · USEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLUniversity Hospital and Clinics · USUniversity of Amsterdam · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLAutorité de Sûreté Nucléaire · FRCracow School of Health Promotion · PLLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUNSW Sydney · AUUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the relationship between ISO 9001 certification, healthcare accreditation and quality management in European hospitals.

designA mixed method multi-level cross-sectional design in seven countries. External teams assessed clinical services on the use of quality management systems, illustrated by four clinical pathways. SETTING AND

participantsSeventy-three acute care hospitals with a total of 291 services managing acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hip fracture, stroke and obstetric deliveries, in Czech Republic, France, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Turkey.

main outcome measureFour composite measures of quality and safety [specialized expertise and responsibility (SER), evidence-based organization of pathways (EBOP), patient safety strategies (PSS) and clinical review (CR)] applied to four pathways.

resultsAccreditation in isolation showed benefits in AMI and stroke more than in deliveries and hip fracture; the greatest significant association was with CR in stroke. Certification in isolation showed little benefit in AMI but had more positive association with the other conditions; greatest significant association was in PSS with stroke. The combination of accreditation and certification showed least benefit in EBOP, but significant benefits in SER (AMI), in PSS (AMI, hip fracture and stroke) and in CR (AMI and stroke).

conclusionsAccreditation and certification are positively associated with clinical leadership, systems for patient safety and clinical review, but not with clinical practice. Both systems promote structures and processes, which support patient safety and clinical organization but have limited effect on the delivery of evidence-based patient care. Further analysis of DUQuE data will explore the association of certification and accreditation with clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

AccreditationCritical PathwaysCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeHospitalsHumansPatient SafetyQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareTurkeyaccreditationcertificationhealth care quality assessmentpatient safetyquality management

Identifiers

PMID24615598
PMCPMC4001697
OpenAlexW2146610485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.