Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24615595›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2014

Measuring clinical management by physicians and nurses in European hospitals: development and validation of two scales.

Thomas Plochg, Onyebuchi A Arah, Daan Botje, Caroline A Thompson, Niek S Klazinga, Cordula Wagner, Russell Mannion, Kiki Lombarts, DUQuE Project Consortium

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deepening our understanding of quality improvement in Europe (DUQuE): overview of a study of hospital quality management in seven countries.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas PlochgDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DE Amsterdam J2-211, The Netherlands; t.plochg@amc.uva.nl.
Onyebuchi A Arah
Daan Botje
Caroline A Thompson
Niek S Klazinga
Cordula Wagner
Russell Mannion
Kiki Lombarts
DUQuE Project Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinical management is hypothesized to be critical for hospital management and hospital performance. The aims of this study were to develop and validate professional involvement scales for measuring the level of clinical management by physicians and nurses in European hospitals.

designTesting of validity and reliability of scales derived from a questionnaire of 21 items was developed on the basis of a previous study and expert opinion and administered in a cross-sectional seven-country research project 'Deepening our Understanding of Quality improvement in Europe' (DUQuE). SETTING AND

participantsA sample of 3386 leading physicians and nurses working in 188 hospitals located in Czech Republic, France, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Turkey.

main outcome measuresValidity and reliability of professional involvement scales and subscales.

resultsPsychometric analysis yielded four subscales for leading physicians: (i) Administration and budgeting, (ii) Managing medical practice, (iii) Strategic management and (iv) Managing nursing practice. Only the first three factors applied well to the nurses. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency ranged from 0.74 to 0.86 for the physicians, and from 0.61 to 0.81 for the nurses. Except for the 0.74 correlation between 'Administration and budgeting' and 'Managing medical practice' among physicians, all inter-scale correlations were <0.70 (range 0.43-0.61). Under testing for construct validity, the subscales were positively correlated with 'formal management roles' of physicians and nurses.

conclusionsThe professional involvement scales appear to yield reliable and valid data in European hospital settings, but the scale 'Managing medical practice' for nurses needs further exploration. The measurement instrument can be used for international research on clinical management.

Indexed as

Hospital AdministrationMedical Staff, HospitalNursing Staff, HospitalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNurse's RolePhysician's RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyclinical managementhospital managementprofessional involvementquality systems

Identifiers

PMID24615595
PMCPMC4001689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.