Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24615546›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2015

Prevention trial in the Cherokee Nation: design of a randomized community trial.

Kelli A Komro, Alexander C Wagenaar, Misty Boyd, B J Boyd, Terrence Kominsky, Dallas Pettigrew, Amy L Tobler, Sarah D Lynne-Landsman, Melvin D Livingston, Bethany Livingston and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Community Awareness of Outreach Efforts to Reduce Underage Drinking on California Indian Reservations.American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) · 2020
    Article
  12. Health-Related Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Alcohol Sales to Youth: Data from Rural Communities Within the Cherokee Nation.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelli A KomroDepartment of Health Outcomes & Policy, College of Medicine and Institute for Child Health Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, komro@ufl.edu.
Alexander C Wagenaar
Misty Boyd
B J Boyd
Terrence Kominsky
Dallas Pettigrew
Amy L Tobler
Sarah D Lynne-Landsman
Melvin D Livingston
Bethany Livingston
Mildred M Maldonado Molina
Cherokee Nation · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

Cherokee Nation Prevention Trial: Interactive Effects of Environment & SBIRTR01AA020695 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI KOMRO, KELLI ANN · 2011 to 2015
$4.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS 5R01AA02069NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in prevention science and practice in recent decades, the U.S. continues to struggle with significant alcohol-related risks and consequences among youth, especially among vulnerable rural and Native American youth. The Prevention Trial in the Cherokee Nation is a partnership between prevention scientists and Cherokee Nation Behavioral Health to create, implement, and evaluate a new, integrated community-level intervention designed to prevent underage drinking and associated negative consequences among Native American and other youth living in rural high-risk underserved communities. The intervention builds directly on results of multiple previous trials of two conceptually distinct approaches. The first is an updated version of CMCA, an established community environmental change intervention, and the second is CONNECT, our newly developed population-wide intervention based on screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) research. CMCA direct-action community organizing is used to engage local citizens to address community norms and practices related to alcohol use and commercial and social access to alcohol among adolescents. The new CONNECT intervention expands traditional SBIRT to be implemented universally within schools. Six key research design elements optimize causal inference and experimental evaluation of intervention effects, including a controlled interrupted time-series design, purposive selection of towns, random assignment to study condition, nested cohorts as well as repeated cross-sectional observations, a factorial design crossing two conceptually distinct interventions, and multiple comparison groups. The purpose of this paper is to describe the strong partnership between prevention scientists and behavioral health leaders within the Cherokee Nation, and the intervention and research design of this new community trial.

Indexed as

Indians, North AmericanAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24615546
PMCPMC4308639
OpenAlexW2095128956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.