Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24615305›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Effect of stratified care for low back pain in family practice (IMPaCT Back): a prospective population-based sequential comparison.

Nadine E Foster, Ricky Mullis, Jonathan C Hill, Martyn Lewis, David G T Whitehurst, Carol Doyle, Kika Konstantinou, Chris Main, Simon Somerville, Gail Sowden and 4 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 141 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
19.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03065439 nacompletednot on this map

The Association Between STarT Back Tool Subgroups of Patients With Low Back Pain and Postural Stability Under Conditions of Sensory Deprivation and Cognitive Load

TypeinterventionalSponsorAalborg University HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled65ConditionsLow Back Pain, PosturalArmsStatic balance testing
NCT07696741 narecruitingnot on this map

Pain Reprocessing Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2026 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsChronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), Nociplastic PainArmsPain Reprocessing Therapy, Monitoring and Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 278 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadine E FosterArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Ricky Mullis
Jonathan C Hill
Martyn Lewis
David G T Whitehurst
Carol Doyle
Kika Konstantinou
Chris Main
Simon Somerville
Gail Sowden
Simon Wathall
Julie Young
Elaine M Hay
IMPaCT Back Study team
Keele University · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBVancouver Coastal Health · CA

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to determine the effects of implementing risk-stratified care for low back pain in family practice on physician's clinical behavior, patient outcomes, and costs.

methodsThe IMPaCT Back Study (IMplementation to improve Patient Care through Targeted treatment) prospectively compared separate patient cohorts in a preintervention phase (6 months of usual care) and a postintervention phase (12 months of stratified care) in family practice, involving 64 family physicians and linked physical therapy services. A total of 1,647 adults with low back pain were invited to participate. Stratified care entailed use of a risk stratification tool to classify patients into groups at low, medium, or high risk for persistent disability and provision of risk-matched treatment. The primary outcome was 6-month change in disability as assessed with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Process outcomes captured physician behavior change in risk-appropriate referral to physical therapy, diagnostic tests, medication prescriptions, and sickness certifications. A cost-utility analysis estimated incremental quality-adjusted life-years and back-related health care costs. Analysis was by intention to treat.

resultsThe 922 patients studied (368 in the preintervention phase and 554 in the postintervention phase) had comparable baseline characteristics. At 6 months follow-up, stratified care had a small but significant benefit relative to usual care as seen from a mean difference in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire scores of 0.7 (95% CI, 0.1-1.4), with a large, clinically important difference in the high risk group of 2.3 (95% CI, 0.8-3.9). Mean time off work was 50% shorter (4 vs 8 days, P = .03) and the proportion of patients given sickness certifications was 30% lower (9% vs 15%, P = .03) in the postintervention cohort. Health care cost savings were also observed.

conclusionsStratified care for back pain implemented in family practice leads to significant improvements in patient disability outcomes and a halving in time off work, without increasing health care costs. Wider implementation is recommended.

Indexed as

Family PracticePhysical Therapy ModalitiesAdultDisability EvaluationEnglandFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality ImprovementRecovery of FunctionReferral and ConsultationRisk Assessmentfamily practicelow back painpractice-based researchprimary carequality improvementscreeningstratified caresubgroups

Identifiers

PMID24615305
PMCPMC3948756
OpenAlexW2131158372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.