Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24614814›Full record

ArticleClinical obstetrics and gynecology2014

Epidemiologic considerations: scope of problem and disparity concerns.

Darios Getahun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Darios GetahunDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California.

Funding

Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy OutcomesR01HD071986 · NICHD · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI DUBLIN, SASCHA, GETAHUN, DARIOS · 2013 to 2016
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071986NICHD NIH HHS R01HD071986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elective labor induction is an increasingly common practice not only in high-income countries but also in many low-income and middle-income countries. Many questions remain unanswered on the safety and cost-effectiveness of elective labor induction, particularly in resource-constrained settings wherein there may be a high unmet need for medically indicated inductions, as well as limited or no access to appropriate medications and equipment for induction and monitoring, comprehensive emergency obstetric care, safe, and timely cesarean section, and appropriate supervision from health professionals. This article considers the global perspective on the epidemiology, practices, safety, and costs associated with elective labor induction.

Indexed as

Elective Surgical ProceduresEthnicityFemaleGlobal HealthHumansLabor, InducedPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID24614814
PMCPMC4008709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.