Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24614759›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Safety and immunogenicity of a live attenuated mumps vaccine: a phase I clinical trial.

Yan Liang, Jingchen Ma, Changgui Li, Yuguo Chen, Longding Liu, Yun Liao, Ying Zhang, Li Jiang, Xuan-Yi Wang, Yanchun Che and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mumps virus infection disrupts blood-testis barrier through the induction of TNF-α in Sertoli cells.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  8. Attenuated MuV-S79 as vector stably expressing foreign gene.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Yan LiangInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Jingchen MaHebei province Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Shijiazhuang, PR China.
Changgui LiNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control; Beijing, PR China.
Yuguo ChenInstitute of Biological Sciences; Fudan University; Shanghai, PR China.
Longding LiuInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Yun LiaoInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Ying ZhangInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Li JiangInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Xuan-Yi WangInstitute of Biological Sciences; Fudan University; Shanghai, PR China.
Yanchun CheInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Wei DengInstitute of Biological Sciences; Fudan University; Shanghai, PR China.
Hong LiNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control; Beijing, PR China.
Xiaoyu CuiNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control; Beijing, PR China.
Na MaInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Dong DingInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Zhongping XieInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Pingfang CuiInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Qiuyan JiInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
JingJing WangInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Yuliang ZhaoHebei province Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Shijiazhuang, PR China.
Junzhi WangNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control; Beijing, PR China.
Qihan LiInstitute Of Medical Biology; Chinese Academy of Medicine Science; Peking Union Medical College; Kunming, PR China.
Academy of Medicine · SGBeijing Administration Institute · CNFudan University · CNInstitute of Medical Biology · SGKunming University · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CNCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNInstitut des Sciences Biologiques · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMumps, a communicable, acute and previously well-controlled disease, has had recent and occasional resurgences in some areas.

methodsA randomized, double-blind, controlled and multistep phase I study of an F-genotype attenuated mumps vaccine produced in human diploid cells was conducted. A total of 300 subjects were enrolled and divided into 4 age groups: 16-60 years, 5-16 years, 2-5 years and 8-24 months. The groups were immunized with one injection per subject. Three different doses of the F-genotype attenuated mumps vaccine, A (3.5 ± 0.25 logCCID50), B (4.25 ± 0.25 logCCID50) and C (5.0 ± 0.25 logCCID50), as well as a placebo control and a positive control of a licensed A-genotype vaccine (S79 strain) were used. The safety and immunogenicity of this vaccine were compared with those of the controls.

resultsThe safety evaluation suggested that mild adverse reactions were observed in all groups. No serious adverse event (SAE) was reported throughout the trial. The immunogenicity test showed a similar seroconversion rate of the neutralizing and ELISA antibody in the 2- to 5-year-old and 8- to 24-month-old groups compared with the seroconversion rate in the positive control. The GMT of the neutralizing anti-F-genotype virus antibodies in the vaccine groups was slightly higher than that in the positive control group.

conclusionsThe F-genotype attenuated mumps vaccine evaluated in this clinical trial was demonstrated to be safe and have effective immunogenicity vs. control.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCoughFemaleHumansImmunogenetic PhenomenaInfantMaleMiddle AgedMumpsMumps VaccineSingle-Blind MethodVirus SheddingYoung AdultMumps VaccineF genotype attenuated mumps vaccineimmunogenicityPhase I clinical trialsafety

Identifiers

PMID24614759
PMCPMC4896512
OpenAlexW2095427031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.