Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24614755›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

From cues to signals: evolution of interspecific communication via aposematism and mimicry in a predator-prey system.

Kenna D S Lehmann, Brian W Goldman, Ian Dworkin, David M Bryson, Aaron P Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of musical pitch in long-distance defensive signaling.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Conversion of social organization in fire ants induced by few colony members: Unmasking indirect genetic effects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. A diabetes-like biochemical and behavioural phenotype ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenna D S LehmannDepartment of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Brian W GoldmanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Ian DworkinDepartment of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
David M BrysonBEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Aaron P WagnerBEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current theory suggests that many signaling systems evolved from preexisting cues. In aposematic systems, prey warning signals benefit both predator and prey. When the signal is highly beneficial, a third species often evolves to mimic the toxic species, exploiting the signaling system for its own protection. We investigated the evolutionary dynamics of predator cue utilization and prey signaling in a digital predator-prey system in which prey could evolve to alter their appearance to mimic poison-free or poisonous prey. In predators, we observed rapid evolution of cue recognition (i.e. active behavioral responses) when presented with sufficiently poisonous prey. In addition, active signaling (i.e. mimicry) evolved in prey under all conditions that led to cue utilization. Thus we show that despite imperfect and dishonest signaling, given a high cost of consuming poisonous prey, complex systems of interspecific communication can evolve via predator cue recognition and prey signal manipulation. This provides evidence supporting hypotheses that cues may serve as stepping-stones in the evolution of more advanced communication and signaling systems that incorporate information about the environment.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationBiological EvolutionCuesAnimalsAnimals, PoisonousPigmentationPredatory BehaviorSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24614755
PMCPMC3948874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.