Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24614586›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Hope for restoration of dead valuable bulls through cloning using donor somatic cells isolated from cryopreserved semen.

Naresh L Selokar, Monika Saini, Prabhat Palta, Manmohan S Chauhan, Radheysham Manik, Suresh K Singla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. SCNT and genome editing in Buffalo, the black gold of the tropics.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  3. Production of Water Buffalo SCNT Embryos by Handmade Cloning.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cloning of breeding buffalo bulls in India: Initiatives & challenges.The Indian journal of medical research · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naresh L SelokarAnimal Biotechnology Centre, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India; Cellular Reprogramming Lab., Department of Animal Physiology and Reproduction, Central Institute for Research on Buffaloes, Hisar, India.
Monika SainiAnimal Biotechnology Centre, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India.
Prabhat PaltaAnimal Biotechnology Centre, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India.
Manmohan S ChauhanAnimal Biotechnology Centre, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India.
Radheysham ManikAnimal Biotechnology Centre, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India.
Suresh K SinglaAnimal Biotechnology Centre, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India.
National Dairy Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic cells were isolated from cryopreserved semen of 4 buffalo bulls, 3 of which had died over 10 years earlier, and were established in culture. The cells expressed cytokeratin-18, keratin and vimentin indicating that they were of epithelial origin. The cells were used as nuclear donors for hand-made cloning for producing buffalo embryos. The blastocyst rate and quality, as indicated by apoptotic index, were comparable among embryos produced using cells obtained from fresh or frozen-thawed semen or those obtained from conventional cell sources such as skin. Examination of the epigenetic status revealed that the global level of H3K27me3 but not that of H3K9/14ac and H4K5ac differed significantly (P<0.05) among cloned embryos from different bulls. The relative mRNA abundance of HDAC1, DNMT1, P53 and CASPASE 3 but not that of DNMT3a differed in cells and in cloned embryos. Following transfer of 24 cloned embryos produced from fresh semen-derived cells to 12 recipients, one calf weighing 55 kg, which is now 6 months of age and is normal, was born through normal parturition. Following transfer of 20 embryos produced from frozen-thawed semen-derived cells to 10 recipients, 2 became pregnant, one of which aborted in the first trimester; the calf born was severely underweight (17 kg), and died 12 h after birth. The ability of cells derived from fresh and frozen-thawed semen to produce live offspring confirms the ability of these cells to be reprogrammed. Our findings pave the way for restoration of highly precious progeny-tested bulls, which has immense economic importance, and can also be used for restoration of endangered species.

Indexed as

Cloning, OrganismAnimalsCattleCells, CulturedCell SeparationCell SurvivalClone CellsCryopreservationDNA MethylationEmbryo, MammalianEmbryo TransferEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression RegulationHistonesLysineMaleHistonesLysineRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24614586
PMCPMC3948694
OpenAlexW2002435383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.