Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24614377›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Randomized clinical trial comparing the pharmacokinetics of standard- and increased-dosage lopinavir-ritonavir coformulation tablets in HIV-positive pregnant women.

Marilia Santini-Oliveira, Rita de Cássia Elias Estrela, Valdiléa Gonçalves Veloso, Vitória Berg Cattani, Carolyn Yanavich, Luciane Velasque, Thiago Silva Torres, Luana Monteiro Spindola Marins, José Henrique Pilotto, Esaú Custódio João and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00605098 (Pharmacokinetics of the Tablet Formulation of Lopinavir/r as Standard and Increased Dosage During Pregnancy in HIV-infected Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00605098 phase4completednot on this map

Pharmacokinetics of the Tablet Formulation of Lopinavir/r as Standard and Increased Dosage During Pregnancy in HIV-infected Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorOswaldo Cruz FoundationRan2008 to 2012Enrolled60ConditionsHIV Infections, PregnancyArmsLopinavir / ritonavir, Lopinavir/ritonavir
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Maternal endothelial dysfunction in HIV-associated preeclampsia comorbid with COVID-19: a review.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Pharmacokinetics of Once Versus Twice Daily Darunavir in Pregnant HIV-Infected Women.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marilia Santini-OliveiraLaboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST/AIDS, Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas (IPEC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rita de Cássia Elias Estrela
Valdiléa Gonçalves Veloso
Vitória Berg Cattani
Carolyn Yanavich
Luciane Velasque
Thiago Silva Torres
Luana Monteiro Spindola Marins
José Henrique Pilotto
Esaú Custódio João
José Carlos Saraiva Gonçalves
Beatriz Grinsztejn
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USHospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado · BRUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r)-based regimen is recommended during pregnancy to reduce the risk of HIV mother-to-child transmission, but the appropriate dose is controversial. We compared the pharmacokinetics of standard and increased LPV/r doses during pregnancy. This randomized, open-label prospective study enrolled 60 pregnant women between gestational weeks 14 and 30. The participants received either the standard dose (400/100 mg twice a day [BID]) or increased dose (600/150 mg BID) of LPV/r tablets during pregnancy and the standard dose for 6 weeks after childbirth. Pharmacokinetics analysis was performed using a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Adherent participants who received the standard dose presented minimum LPV concentrations of 4.4, 4.3, and 6.1 μg/ml in the second and third trimesters and postpartum, respectively. The increased-dose group exhibited values of 7.9, 6.9, and 9.2 μg/ml at the same three time points. Although LPV exposure was significantly higher in the increased-dose group, the standard dose produced therapeutic levels of LPV against wild-type virus in all adherent participants, except one patient in the third trimester; 50%, 37.5%, and 25%, and 0%, 15%, and 0% of the participants in the standard- and increased-dose groups failed to achieve therapeutic levels against resistant viruses during the second and third trimesters and after childbirth, respectively. After 12 weeks of treatment and after childbirth, all adherent participants achieved undetectable HIV viral loads, and their babies (49/54) were uninfected. No serious drug-related adverse events were observed. We conclude that the standard dose is appropriate for use during pregnancy and that an increased dose may be necessary for women harboring resistant HIV. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00605098.).

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansLopinavirPregnancyRitonavirYoung AdultHIV Protease InhibitorsLopinavirRitonavir

Identifiers

PMID24614377
PMCPMC3993202
OpenAlexW2028280602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.