Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24614230›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Versatile action of picomolar gradients of progesterone on different sperm subpopulations.

Diego Rafael Uñates, Héctor Alejandro Guidobaldi, Laura Virginia Gatica, Marisa Angélica Cubilla, María Eugenia Teves, Ayelén Moreno, Laura Cecilia Giojalas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Involvement ofF&S reports · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diego Rafael UñatesCentro de Biología Celular y Molecular (UNC) and Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas (UNC-CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina.
Héctor Alejandro GuidobaldiCentro de Biología Celular y Molecular (UNC) and Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas (UNC-CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina.
Laura Virginia GaticaCentro de Biología Celular y Molecular (UNC) and Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas (UNC-CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina.
Marisa Angélica CubillaCentro de Biología Celular y Molecular (UNC) and Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas (UNC-CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina.
María Eugenia TevesCentro de Biología Celular y Molecular (UNC) and Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas (UNC-CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina.
Ayelén MorenoCentro de Biología Celular y Molecular (UNC) and Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas (UNC-CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina.
Laura Cecilia GiojalasCentro de Biología Celular y Molecular (UNC) and Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas (UNC-CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High step concentrations of progesterone may stimulate various sperm physiological processes, such as priming and the acrosome reaction. However, approaching the egg, spermatozoa face increasing concentrations of the hormone, as it is secreted by the cumulus cells and then passively diffuses along the cumulus matrix and beyond. In this context, several questions arise: are spermatozoa sensitive to the steroid gradients as they undergo priming and the acrosome reaction? If so, what are the functional gradual concentrations of progesterone? Do spermatozoa in different physiological states respond differentially to steroid gradients? To answer these questions, spermatozoa were confronted with progesterone gradients generated by different hormone concentrations (1 pM to 100 µM). Brief exposure to a 10 pM progesterone gradient stimulated priming for the acrosome reaction in one sperm subpopulation, and simultaneously induced the acrosome reaction in a different sperm subpopulation. This effect was not observed in non-capacitated cells or when progesterone was homogeneously distributed. The results suggest a versatile role of the gradual distribution of very low doses of progesterone, which selectively stimulate the priming and the acrosome reaction in different sperm subpopulations.

Indexed as

Acrosome ReactionCalciumChemotaxisHumansIntracellular SpaceMaleProgesteroneSpermatozoaCalciumProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID24614230
PMCPMC3948779
OpenAlexW2093943497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.