Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24614074›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

The sum of its parts--effects of gastric distention, nutrient content and sensory stimulation on brain activation.

Maartje S Spetter, Cees de Graaf, Monica Mars, Max A Viergever, Paul A M Smeets

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01644539 (Functional MRI of Satiety, the Interaction Between Gastric and Oral Stimulation and Related Hormones in Healthy Men), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01644539 nacompletednot on this map

Functional MRI of Satiety, the Interaction Between Gastric and Oral Stimulation and Related Hormones in Healthy Men

TypeinterventionalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2011 to 2011Enrolled16ConditionsAppetite RegulationArmsWater with guar gum - Non Caloric, Chocolate milk - Oral Caloric, Chocolate milk - Intra Gastric Caloric
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Neuroimaging Model of Visceral Manipulation in an Awake Rat.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Interoceptive rhythms in the brain.Nature neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maartje S SpetterImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cees de GraafDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Monica MarsDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Max A ViergeverImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Paul A M SmeetsImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledDuring food consumption the brain integrates multiple interrelated neural and hormonal signals involved in the regulation of food intake. Factors influencing the decision to stop eating include the foods' sensory properties, macronutrient content, and volume, which in turn affect gastric distention and appetite hormone responses. So far, the contributions of gastric distention and oral stimulation by food on brain activation have not been studied. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of gastric distention with an intra-gastric load and the additional effect of oral stimulation on brain activity after food administration. Our secondary objective was to study the correlations between hormone responses and appetite-related ratings and brain activation. Fourteen men completed three functional magnetic resonance imaging sessions during which they either received a naso-gastric infusion of water (stomach distention), naso-gastric infusion of chocolate milk (stomach distention + nutrients), or ingested chocolate-milk (stomach distention + nutrients + oral exposure). Appetite ratings and blood parameters were measured at several time points. During gastric infusion, brain activation was observed in the midbrain, amygdala, hypothalamus, and hippocampus for both chocolate milk and water, i.e., irrespective of nutrient content. The thalamus, amygdala, putamen and precuneus were activated more after ingestion than after gastric infusion of chocolate milk, whereas infusion evoked greater activation in the hippocampus and anterior cingulate. Moreover, areas involved in gustation and reward were activated more after oral stimulation. Only insulin responses following naso-gastric infusion of chocolate milk correlated with brain activation, namely in the putamen and insula. In conclusion, we show that normal (oral) food ingestion evokes greater activation than gastric infusion in stomach distention and food intake-related brain areas. This provides neural evidence for the importance of sensory stimulation in the process of satiation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01644539.

Indexed as

Brain MappingSensationAnimalsBody WeightBrainGastric DilatationHormonesHumansInfusion PumpsInsulinMaleMilkPhysical StimulationWaterYoung AdultHormonesInsulinWater

Identifiers

PMID24614074
PMCPMC3948722
OpenAlexW1979590231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.