Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24613984›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychiatry2014

Automated computerized analysis of speech in psychiatric disorders.

Alex S Cohen, Brita Elvevåg

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Detection of acute 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) effects across protocols using automated natural language processing.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Multitask and Transfer Learning Approach for Joint Classification and Severity Estimation of Dysphonia.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex S CohenaDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA bPsychiatry Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø cThe Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine (NST), University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Brita Elvevåg
Louisiana State University · USUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

Identifying the Vocal Markers of Schizophrenia-Spectrum DisordersR03MH092622 · NIMH · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI COHEN, ALEX S · 2011 to 2012
$148k
NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH092622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDisturbances in communication are a hallmark feature of severe mental illnesses. Recent technological advances have paved the way for objectifying communication using automated computerized semantic, linguistic and acoustic analyses. We review recent studies applying various computer-based assessments to the natural language produced by adult patients with severe mental illness. RECENT

findingsAutomated computerized methods afford tools with which it is possible to objectively evaluate patients in a reliable, valid and efficient manner that complements human ratings. Crucially, these measures correlate with important clinical measures. The clinical relevance of these novel metrics has been demonstrated by showing their relationship to functional outcome measures, their in-vivo link to classic 'language' regions in the brain, and, in the case of linguistic analysis, their relationship to candidate genes for severe mental illness. SUMMARY: Computer-based assessments of natural language afford a framework with which to measure communication disturbances in adults with severe mental illnesses. Emerging evidence suggests that they can be reliable and valid, and overcome many practical limitations of more traditional assessment methods. The advancement of these technologies offers unprecedented potential for measuring and understanding some of the most crippling symptoms of some of the most debilitating illnesses known to humankind.

Indexed as

Communication DisordersDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansLinguisticsMental DisordersSemanticsSpeech Disorders

Identifiers

PMID24613984
PMCPMC4212642
OpenAlexW2322892874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.