Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24613936›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2014

Drosophila hematopoiesis: Markers and methods for molecular genetic analysis.

Cory J Evans, Ting Liu, Utpal Banerjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Draper-mediated efferocytosis bybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Exploring new dimensions of immune cell biology inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Growth deregulation and interaction with host hemocytes contribute to tumor progression in a Drosophila brain tumor model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cory J EvansDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Ting LiuDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Utpal BanerjeeDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: banerjee@mbi.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Genomic and Genetic Dissection of Hematopoietic Development in DrosophilaR01HL067395 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SIEKHAUS, DARIA E · 2001 to 2025
$9.0M
A Drosophila model for NFkB and prostaglandin dependent inflammatory responseR21AI094048 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BANERJEE, UTPAL · 2011 to 2012
$424k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL067395NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI094048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyses of the Drosophila hematopoietic system are becoming more and more prevalent as developmental and functional parallels with vertebrate blood cells become more evident. Investigative work on the fly blood system has, out of necessity, led to the identification of new molecular markers for blood cell types and lineages and to the refinement of useful molecular genetic tools and analytical methods. This review briefly describes the Drosophila hematopoietic system at different developmental stages, summarizes the major useful cell markers and tools for each stage, and provides basic protocols for practical analysis of circulating blood cells and of the lymph gland, the larval hematopoietic organ.

Indexed as

LarvaAnimalsCell LineageDevelopmental BiologyDrosophilaHematopoiesisLymphBloodDrosophilaHematopoiesisHemocytesLymph glandProtocol

Identifiers

PMID24613936
PMCPMC4051208
OpenAlexW2015891630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.