Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24613829›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2014

Preclinical evaluation of marketed sodium channel blockers in a rat model of myotonia discloses promising antimyotonic drugs.

Jean-François Desaphy, Roberta Carbonara, Teresa Costanza, Diana Conte Camerino

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Pharmacological therapy of non-dystrophic myotonias.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2025
    Review
  6. Preclinical study of the antimyotonic efficacy of safinamide in the myotonic mouse model.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Blockers of Skeletal Muscle NaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Skeletal muscle ClC-1 chloride channels in health and diseases.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Tetrodotoxin-Sensitive Neuronal-Type NaJournal of the American Heart Association · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Treatment Updates for Neuromuscular Channelopathies.Current treatment options in neurology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean-François DesaphySection of Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy & Drug Sciences, University of Bari-Aldo Moro, Bari I-70125, Italy. Electronic address: jeanfrancois.desaphy@uniba.it.
Roberta CarbonaraSection of Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy & Drug Sciences, University of Bari-Aldo Moro, Bari I-70125, Italy.
Teresa CostanzaSection of Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy & Drug Sciences, University of Bari-Aldo Moro, Bari I-70125, Italy.
Diana Conte CamerinoSection of Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy & Drug Sciences, University of Bari-Aldo Moro, Bari I-70125, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

Telethon GGP10101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the sodium channel blocker mexiletine is considered the first-line drug in myotonia, some patients experiment adverse effects, while others do not gain any benefit. Other antimyotonic drugs are thus needed to offer mexiletine alternatives. In the present study, we used a previously-validated rat model of myotonia congenita to compare six marketed sodium channel blockers to mexiletine. Myotonia was induced in the rat by injection of anthracen-9-carboxylic acid, a muscle chloride channel blocker. The drugs were given orally and myotonia was evaluated by measuring the time of righting reflex. The drugs were also tested on sodium currents recorded in a cell line transfected with the human skeletal muscle sodium channel hNav1.4 using patch-clamp technique. In vivo, carbamazepine and propafenone showed antimyotonic activity at doses similar to mexiletine (ED50 close to 5mg/kg); flecainide and orphenadrine showed greater potency (ED50 near 1mg/kg); lubeluzole and riluzole were the more potent (ED50 near 0.1mg/kg). The antimyotonic activity of drugs in vivo was linearly correlated with their potency in blocking hNav1.4 channels in vitro. Deviation was observed for propafenone and carbamazepine, likely due to pharmacokinetics and multiple targets. The comparison of the antimyotonic dose calculated in rats with the current clinical dose in humans strongly suggests that all the tested drugs may be used safely for the treatment of human myotonia. Considering the limits of mexiletine tolerability and the occurrence of non-responders, this study proposes an arsenal of alternative drugs, which may prove useful to increase the quality of life of individuals suffering from non-dystrophic myotonia. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm these results.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbamazepineDisease Models, AnimalFlecainideHEK293 CellsHumansMexiletineMuscle, SkeletalMyotonia CongenitaOrphenadrinePiperidinesPropafenoneRatsRats, WistarRiluzoleSodium Channel BlockersCarbamazepineFlecainidelubeluzoleMexiletineOrphenadrinePiperidinesPropafenoneRiluzoleSodium Channel BlockersThiazolesMexiletineNon-dystrophic myotoniaOver-excitabilityPatch-clampRat modelSodium channel blockers

Identifiers

PMID24613829
PMCPMC4004800
OpenAlexW2073452482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.