Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24613534›Full record

Trial reportFertility and sterility2014

Simple circumcision device: proof of concept for a single-visit, adjustable device to facilitate safe adult male circumcision.

James M Hotaling, Laura S Leddy, Mahum A Haider, Matthew Mossanen, Michael R Bailey, Brian MacConaghy, Francis Olson, John N Krieger

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Fertility and sterility, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James M HotalingDepartment of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: jim.hotaling@hsc.utah.edu.
Laura S LeddyDepartment of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Mahum A HaiderDepartment of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Matthew MossanenDepartment of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Michael R BaileyVeterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Brian MacConaghyApplied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Francis OlsonApplied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
John N KriegerDepartment of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

INSTITUTE FOR TRANSLATIONAL HEALTH SCIENCE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025014 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$51.5M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025014NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a proof-of-concept study to determine the potential utility of a novel, adjustable single-visit, disposable device to facilitate rapid adult circumcision.

designProspective pilot trial of a novel surgical device.

settingTertiary care Veterans Administration medical center. PATIENT(S): Five adult males. INTERVENTION(S): Circumcisions performed by junior trainees using an adjustable, single-size surgical-assist device constructed by the University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The attending surgeon and trainees completed standardized forms after each procedure to assess technical problems and ease of use. Follow-up visits were scheduled to evaluate adverse events, postoperative pain, cosmetic outcomes, and participant satisfaction at 3, 8, 30, and 90 days postoperatively. RESULT(S): The average operative time was 16.4 minutes. All cases were performed with local anesthesia, and no case required electrocautery or conversion to standard surgery. At the postoperative day 3 visit, all subjects were happy with their results and would recommend the procedure to another patient. One participant had a minor wound separation noted at the 30-day visit that resolved during follow-up. There were no wound infections, hematomas, or other adverse events. CONCLUSION(S): This proof-of-study suggests that the Simple Circumcision Device may facilitate delivery of safe adult male circumcision services.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyAdultCircumcision, MaleEquipment DesignFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleOperative TimePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAIDScircumcisionHIVsurgical device

Identifiers

PMID24613534
PMCPMC4874330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.